# Gastrointestinal Tolerance and Gut Microbiota Modulation of Encapsulated and Free Forms of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis

**Authors:** Geonhee Kim, Hyunbin Seong, Seung Hee Han, Hwa Rin Kim, Sung-Hwan Kim, Hye-Jin Ku, Hye-Jung Han, Chul-Hong Kim, Nam Soo Han

PMC · DOI: 10.4014/jmb.2506.06028 · Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · 2025-09-24

## TL;DR

This study compares how encapsulated and free forms of two probiotic bacteria survive digestion and affect gut microbes, showing that encapsulation improves survival and both forms support beneficial gut bacteria.

## Contribution

The study introduces a multilayer encapsulation method that enhances probiotic survival and reveals strain-specific effects on gut microbiota modulation.

## Key findings

- Encapsulated probiotics showed higher viability and membrane integrity compared to free forms.
- Both probiotic strains increased beneficial genera like Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus without causing dysbiosis.
- Probiotic supplementation increased short-chain fatty acid production, indicating enhanced microbial activity.

## Abstract

The viability and efficacy of probiotics are strongly influenced by their delivery form, especially under harsh gastrointestinal conditions. This study assessed the gastrointestinal resistance of encapsulated and free from Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, and evaluated the specific effects of digested free from strains on the gut microbiome. An in vitro digestion model simulating gastric and intestinal conditions was used to assess probiotic survival, followed by fecal fermentation to examine microbial and metabolic responses. The encapsulated probiotics, formulated with a multilayer matrix, demonstrated significantly higher viability and preserved membrane integrity than the free forms. Despite reduced viability, free from probiotics modulated the gut microbiota. Both strains promoted colonization of beneficial genera such as Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Prevotella, while maintaining microbial balance without inducing dysbiosis. Additionally, probiotic supplementation enhanced short-chain fatty acid production, particularly acetate and butyrate, indicating increased microbial fermentation activity. Notably, distinct ecological patterns emerged between the two strains, with L. acidophilus inducing dynamic shifts and recovery, and B. lactis contributing to structural stability. These findings underscore the importance of strain-specific selection and encapsulation strategies in developing targeted and effective probiotic interventions.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Lactobacillus acidophilus (taxon 1579), Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis (taxon 302911), Bifidobacterium (taxon 1678), Lactobacillus (taxon 1578), Prevotella (taxon 838)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** butyrate (MESH:D002087), short-chain fatty acid (MESH:D005232), acetate (MESH:D000085)
- **Species:** Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis (subspecies) [taxon 1360], Prevotella (genus) [taxon 838], Bifidobacterium (genus) [taxon 1678], Lactobacillus acidophilus (species) [taxon 1579], Lactococcus lactis (species) [taxon 1358], gut metagenome (species) [taxon 749906]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12535859/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12535859/full.md

## References

45 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12535859/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12535859