# Lifelong Craniofacial Growth: Clinical Implications for Osseointegrated Implants

## TL;DR

This paper discusses how lifelong craniofacial growth can affect the long-term success of dental implants, even if they initially meet all clinical success criteria.

## Contribution

The paper introduces the need to revise implant success criteria to account for lifelong craniofacial changes.

## Key findings

- Peri-implant tissue stability can persist for decades despite craniofacial growth.
- Lifelong positional changes in jaw structures can cause functional or esthetic discrepancies.
- Current implant success benchmarks may not account for dynamic craniofacial growth.

## Abstract

Endosseous dental implants have demonstrated high clinical success rates, with outcomes consistently replicated across diverse clinical settings. Over time, definitions of implant success have evolved from basic parameters such as pain-free function and absence of infection to more comprehensive criteria, including peri-implant bone stability, marginal bone loss thresholds, intimate bone-to-implant adaptation, and soft-tissue harmony essential for optimal esthetics. While complete-arch, implant-supported rehabilitations within edentulous jaws may maintain a static relationship over time, mixed dentition scenarios involving both natural teeth and implants are influenced by the dynamic nature of craniofacial growth. Although osseointegration and peri-implant tissue stability may persist for decades, the adjacent dentition and jaw structures continue to undergo subtle lifelong positional changes. This disparity can result in functional or esthetic discrepancies despite meeting all conventional success benchmarks. Consequently, the criteria for long-term implant success must consider the impact of lifelong craniofacial growth, which may gradually compromise the harmony between static implant restorations and the continually adapting natural dentition.