# Management of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) of the colon with Clostridium butyricum CBM588 versus rifaximin: a retrospective cross-sectional study

**Authors:** Riccardo Urgesi, Cristiano Pagnini, Fernando De Angelis, Amjad Khan, Lorella Pallotta, Gianfranco Fanello, Pavlos Antypas, Maria Carla Di Paolo, Giuseppe Villotti, Alexander Bertuccioli, Davide Sisti, Francesco Di Pierro, Nicola Zerbinati, Maria Giovanna Graziani

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00384-025-05005-6 · International Journal of Colorectal Disease · 2025-10-18

## TL;DR

This study compared a probiotic (CBM588) to an antibiotic (rifaximin) for managing symptoms of a chronic colon condition called SUDD.

## Contribution

The study provides a first comparison of CBM588 and rifaximin for SUDD symptom management in a real-world setting.

## Key findings

- CBM588 and rifaximin had similar rates of preventing diverticulitis flare-ups.
- More patients on CBM588 reported adequate symptom relief compared to rifaximin.
- No adverse events were reported in either treatment group.

## Abstract

Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) is a chronic condition frequently characterized by abdominal pain, bloating, and altered bowel habits. While cyclic rifaximin is commonly used for symptom control, interest is growing in the potential role of probiotics. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with SUDD treated with either Clostridium butyricum CBM588® or cyclic rifaximin over a 12-month period.

This retrospective cross-sectional study included 70 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SUDD, treated between 2023 and 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on treatment received: Group A (CBM588® daily for 12 months) and Group B (cyclic rifaximin 400 mg bid for 7 days per month). Clinical data, symptom profiles, and occurrence of diverticulitis were collected and compared. The primary outcome was the reduction of SUDD-related symptoms, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of acute diverticulitis episodes during follow-up.

A total of 56 patients completed the 12-month follow-up (31 in Group A, 25 in Group B). No significant difference was observed in the rate of symptomatic flares between groups (19.4% vs. 20%, p = 0.7). However, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the CBM588® group reported adequate symptom relief (77.4% vs. 44%, p = 0.02). Improvements in bloating and tenesmus were more frequent in the CBM588® group, although not statistically significant. No treatment-related adverse events were recorded.

In this retrospective comparison, Clostridium butyricum CBM588® demonstrated similar efficacy to rifaximin in preventing diverticulitis, with a potential advantage in subjective symptom improvement. These findings support further prospective studies to explore the role of CBM588® in SUDD management.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrial.gov reference: NCT06852274

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** rifaximin (PubChem CID 6436173)
- **Diseases:** diverticulitis (MONDO:0004235)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** abdominal pain (MESH:D015746), SUDD (MESH:D000076385), diverticulitis (MESH:D004238)
- **Chemicals:** rifaximin (MESH:D000078262), CBM588 (-)
- **Species:** Clostridium butyricum (species) [taxon 1492], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12535492/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12535492/full.md

## References

6 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12535492/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12535492