ASO Author Reflections: RUNX3 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumor Microenvironment: Bridging Mechanisms and Clinical Potential
Weijin Xiao, Xiaohui Chen

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —Fujian Provincial Natural and Scientific Foundation
- —The Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
- —Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian Province
- —Science and technology projects of Quanzhou city
- —Fujian Research and Training Grants for Young and Middle-aged Leaders in Healthcare
- —Fujian Provincial Academic and Research Program for Young and Middle-age Teachers
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImmune cells in cancer · Lung Cancer Research Studies · Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
Past: Unanswered Questions About RUNX3 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RUNX3 has long been recognized as a tumor suppressor gene (TSG) in various cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its specific biological mechanisms, particularly how it influences the tumor microenvironment (TME), remain poorly understood.^1^ Clinically, NSCLC remains a leading cause of cancer mortality, with its progression closely tied to TME dynamics, including immune cell infiltration and stromal interactions.^2^ Key questions persisted: How does RUNX3 expression status shape the TME in NSCLC? Which cell populations mediate its effects? Could these insights inform therapeutic strategies? Our study aimed to address these gaps using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to dissect TME changes associated with RUNX3 expression.
Present: Key Findings and Their Relevance
Our scRNA-seq analysis revealed that RUNX3 expression status is tightly linked to TME composition in NSCLC.^3^ Specifically, RUNX3-positive (RUNX3_Pos) tumors were enriched in fibroblasts, while RUNX3-negative (RUNX3_Neg) tumors accumulated diverse immune cells, including B cells, neutrophils, and plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Critically, mononuclear phagocytes (MPs), encompassing macrophages, monocytes, and dendritic cells, emerged as central players: RUNX3_Pos tumors showed macrophage enrichment, whereas RUNX3_Neg tumors exhibited macrophage depletion and monocyte enrichment.^3^
These findings are significant because they identify MPs as a potential target of RUNX3-mediated TME remodeling. This aligns with broader evidence that tumor-associated myeloid cells (TAMCs) regulate immune responses and tumor progression.^4^ Our data also highlight the role of RUNX3 in modulating antigen presentation pathways (e.g., major histocompatibility class [MHC] class II molecules) and chemotactic signals, offering a mechanistic basis for its tumor-suppressive effects. Together, these results bridge the gap between RUNX3’s TSG function and TME dynamics, providing a framework to explore novel immunotherapeutic strategies.
Future: Directions for Research
Despite these insights, further work is needed. First, in vivo studies using animal models are required to validate the role of RUNX3 in regulating MPs and TME remodeling. Second, larger cohort studies should explore how RUNX3 expression intensity (beyond binary positivity/negativity) influences TME heterogeneity and clinical outcomes. Third, combining RUNX3 targeting with immunotherapies (e.g., checkpoint inhibitors) warrants investigation, given the association of RUNX3 with antigen presentation pathways. Finally, epigenetic regulation of RUNX3 (e.g., methylation) and its impact on TME should be explored to identify potential therapeutic vulnerabilities.^5^
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
