# Public discourses of alternative protein foods in Facebook public pages’ posts, 2014–2024

**Authors:** Weiyu Zhang, Bingyan Wang, Jingyi Xie, Lai Peng Leong, Tai Wei David Leong, Max Jing Rui Tham, Wee Han Ang, Issa Atoum, Issa Atoum, Issa Atoum, Issa Atoum

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0333922 · PLOS One · 2025-10-17

## TL;DR

This study analyzes public discussions about alternative protein foods on Facebook from 2014 to 2024, finding that plant-based options have more consistent attention and positive sentiment compared to cell-based meats.

## Contribution

The study provides a longitudinal analysis of public discourse trends and sentiments around alternative protein foods using Facebook data.

## Key findings

- Public attention on plant-based alternative proteins decreased since 2021, while cell-based proteins showed uneven growth.
- Sentiments toward plant-based proteins were consistently positive, whereas sentiments toward cell-based proteins were mixed.
- Plant-based discussions covered more practical and diverse topics compared to cell-based ones.

## Abstract

“Alternative protein” (AP) refers to protein sources that are different from conventional animal-based proteins. This category encompasses a variety of highly processed plant-based proteins, cultured or cell-based meat, and is primarily driven by factors like sustainability, health, ethical concerns about animal welfare, and the need to feed a growing global population. The aim of this study is to map and understand public discourses around AP foods through social monitoring, in particular, computational analyses of social media big data. Through analyzing the topics and sentiments of Facebook public pages’ English content in the decade of 2014–2024, we found that (1) public attention on plant-based AP foods dropped since 2021, while attention on cell-based AP foods showed an uneven growth; (2) public sentiments towards plant-based AP foods were consistently positive, while sentiments towards cell-based AP foods were clearly more mixed; (3) discussion topics under plant-based AP foods were more practical and diverse than topics under cell-based AP foods; (4) the leading actors talking about AP foods were enterprises & industry, media, and organizations. Overall, plant-based AP foods have generated a more established and diverse public discourse, while cell-based AP foods are still emerging in public conversations and continue to face greater barriers to widespread understanding and acceptance.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** AP (MESH:C536589), cancers (MESH:D009369)
- **Chemicals:** AP (-), diamond (MESH:D018130)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], PX clade (clade) [taxon 569578], Gallus gallus (bantam, species) [taxon 9031]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12533839/full.md

## Figures

6 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12533839/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12533839/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12533839