# Comparison of supervised versus home-based exercise programs following platelet-rich plasma injections in knee osteoarthritis: clinical outcomes from quasi-experimental study

**Authors:** Ghalia Safdar, Mubin Mustafa Kiyani, Salman Ahmed Saleem, Wajeeha Irfan Qureshi, Shahid Bashir, Turki Abualait, Hamid Khan, Abdul Ghafoor Sajjad

PMC · DOI: 10.7717/peerj.19971 · PeerJ · 2025-10-14

## TL;DR

This study compares supervised and home-based exercise programs after PRP injections for knee osteoarthritis, finding that supervised exercises provide better pain relief and mobility improvements.

## Contribution

The study introduces a direct comparison of supervised versus home-based exercise regimens following PRP injections in knee osteoarthritis patients.

## Key findings

- Both groups showed significant improvements in pain, ROM, and function after PRP injections.
- Supervised exercise led to better pain reduction and knee flexion ROM than home-based exercise.
- No significant difference was found in knee extension ROM between the two groups.

## Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by severe pain and decreased range of motion (ROM), mostly managed with conservative treatments. Therapies like platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular injections have gained fame for pain relief when surgery is a last resort.

To compare the effectiveness of a supervised exercise program versus a home-based exercise program following PRP injections in terms of pain relief, ROM improvement, and disability reduction in knee osteoarthritis patients.

A quasi-experimental design was employed, enrolling 32 patients diagnosed with knee OA cases (age range: 40–60 years; 59% female), divided into two groups: a supervised exercise group (n = 16) and an unsupervised/home-based exercise group (n = 16). Both groups received two PRP injections spaced 15 days apart. The supervised group followed a structured exercise protocol, including cold packs post-injection for pain management. The program comprises three sessions per week for one month. The unsupervised group received similar exercises to be performed independently at home. Data analysis was conducted using parametric and non-parametric statistical methods based on data distribution.

Both groups exhibited significant improvements from baseline to post-intervention in pain, ROM, and functional status (p < 0.05). The supervised exercise group demonstrated superior outcomes in pain reduction, knee flexion ROM, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). However, no significant difference was observed between groups for knee extension ROM (p = 0.378).

Both supervised and unsupervised exercise programs improved outcomes in knee OA patients following PRP injections; the supervised program showed greater pain relief, flexion ROM, and functional status. However, no significant difference was observed in knee extension ROM between the two groups.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis (MESH:D020370), OA (MESH:D010003), disability (MESH:D009069), pain (MESH:D010146)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12533533/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12533533/full.md

## References

22 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12533533/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12533533