# Psychometric validation of the PROMIS Fatigue-Short Form 7a in adults with newly diagnosed or recurrent Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease: the ARISE and ENCORE studies

**Authors:** Kevin C. Mange, Daniel Serrano, Mariam Hassan, Marie-Laure Nevoret, Dayton W. Yuen, Shauna McManus, Lauren Podger, Bryant Barnes, Charles L. Daley

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s41687-025-00944-8 · Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes · 2025-10-16

## TL;DR

This study confirms that the PROMIS Fatigue-Short Form 7a is a reliable and valid tool for measuring fatigue in adults with Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease.

## Contribution

The study provides psychometric validation of the PROMIS-F SF-7a specifically for patients with MAC lung disease.

## Key findings

- The PROMIS-F SF-7a showed strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.86) and test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.76).
- It demonstrated strong convergent validity with other fatigue and respiratory symptom measures.
- A −4.00-point change was identified as the threshold for meaningful within-patient improvement in fatigue.

## Abstract

Fatigue symptoms contribute to the burden of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Form v1.0 – Fatigue 7a (PROMIS-F SF-7a) in adults with a new or recurrent diagnosis of MAC lung disease.

Data from the ARISE (NCT04677543) and ENCORE (NCT04677569) phase 3 trials were analyzed. Modern psychometric methods were employed to confirm the structural validity of the PROMIS-F SF-7a within this context of use. Classical methods were used to confirm the reliability and validity of the PROMIS-F SF-7a within this context of use. Internal consistency (McDonald’s omega, Cronbach’s alpha), test-retest reliability (two-way mixed effects intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC(2,1)]), and known-groups validity across Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) Fatigue groups were estimated. Convergent validity (Pearson correlations) was assessed by correlating PROMIS-F SF-7a scores with scores on the Exacerbations of Chronic Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT), EXACT Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS), St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Scale. Meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds were determined using anchor-based methods.

The baseline sample included 231 patients (99 ARISE, 132 ENCORE). The cross-sectional validation sample comprised 230 patients (excluding 1 ARISE patient with missing item-level PROMIS-F SF-7a data). The longitudinal validation analysis sample comprised all 99 ARISE patients. Modern psychometric methods supported the relevance of all items and a unidimensional unit-weighted sum score for the PROMIS-F SF-7a. The PROMIS-F SF-7a demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.86), test-retest reliability (ICC[2, 1]: 0.76), and convergent validity (FACIT-Fatigue: −0.80, EXACT: 0.56, E-RS: 0.52, SGRQ: 0.66). Known-groups validity was demonstrated across PGI-S Fatigue groups. The MWPC analyses supported a −4.00-point median change from baseline (95% CI: −3.00 to −6.00 points) as the estimated threshold of clinically meaningful within-patient improvement for the PROMIS-F SF-7a.

The PROMIS-F SF-7a is a robust, sensitive, and responsive measure of fatigue in adult patients with a new or recurrent diagnosis of MAC lung disease. It is content and psychometrically valid and appears to have interpretability to assess a threshold of MWPC for fatigue symptoms in this population.

ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT04677543, registered 16 December 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04677543. NCT04677569, registered 16 December 2020, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04677569.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-025-00944-8.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Fatigue (MESH:D005221), Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease (MESH:D008171)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12532783/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12532783/full.md

## References

12 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12532783/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12532783