Corrigendum to “Parents’ Experiences with Online Screening Tools in Well-Child Clinics and School Health Services – A Qualitative Study”
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Trine Holm, Elin Thygesen, Geir Inge Hausvik, Thomas Westergren, et al. Parents’ Experiences with Online Screening Tools in Well-Child Clinics and School Health Services – A Qualitative Study. Global Qualitative Nursing Research. Volume 12: 1–12, 2025. doi:10.1177/23333936251342728
In this article, the number of PHNs has been corrected from seven to eight in the “Participants and Recruitment” section. Additionally, the number of women has been corrected from seven to eight under the “PHNs observed (n = 8)” column in Table 1.