# Sequential dependencies in recognition memory are decision based

**Authors:** Michelle A Dollois, Chris M Fiacconi

PMC · DOI: 10.1177/17470218251317122 · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006) · 2025-02-12

## TL;DR

The study finds that repeated decisions in memory tests are due to decision-based effects, not motor actions.

## Contribution

The research demonstrates decision perseveration is not caused by motor priming, using hand-switching and mouse-path manipulations.

## Key findings

- Switching hands between trials still results in decision repetition, indicating it's not motor-based.
- Mouse path repetition does not affect decision carryover, supporting a decision-based mechanism.
- Repeating decisions are faster, independent of motor priming.

## Abstract

Decision perseveration is consistently observed in recognition tests, such that judgements tend to repeat (e.g., “old” responses tend to follow “old” responses) across trials. This effect has been found across a range of testing styles, including old/new judgements, judgements of frequency, and confidence, and has been interpreted as reflecting the transfer of mnemonic information between trials. However, an alternative explanation that response repetition is rather the product of motor action perseveration has not yet been fully evaluated. Despite the range of response styles used across studies, repeat decisions have consistently been confounded with repeat motor responses. Across three experiments, the present study divorces decision repetition from motor priming, to determine whether decision perseveration maintains. Experiments 1 and 2 found that when participants switch hands between trials, decisions are still more likely to repeat than switch. Similarly, Experiment 3 found no difference in the influence of Previous Decision when mouse paths were able to repeat between trials compared with when they could not. In addition, all experiments show a speed advantage for repeating decisions that cannot be attributed to motor priming. We conclude that decision carryover during recognition tests is ultimately a decision-based effect. The results are discussed in terms of mnemonic models of information transfer.

## Full-text entities

- **Species:** Mus musculus (house mouse, species) [taxon 10090], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12531400/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12531400/full.md

## References

54 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12531400/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12531400