# Understanding Pediatric Patient Experiences with Urotherapy Tools: Qualitative Focus Group Study

## TL;DR

This study explores how children aged 9-13 experience traditional urotherapy tools for incontinence, revealing insights for more engaging and child-friendly designs.

## Contribution

The study introduces child-centered design priorities for urotherapy tools based on direct qualitative feedback from children.

## Key findings

- Children expressed mixed attitudes toward urotherapy tools, ranging from motivation to resistance.
- Digital integration and gamification were suggested as ways to modernize outdated tools.
- Peer support during group therapy positively influenced children's experiences.

## Abstract

Standard urotherapy for childhood incontinence involves traditional tools like paper bladder diaries, timer watches, wetting alarms, and uroflowmeters. However, little is known about how these tools are experienced by today’s digitally native children.

This study aimed to explore how children undergoing urotherapy perceive and experience these commonly used tools, with the goal of informing more engaging and child-centered design approaches.

A qualitative focus group design was used with purposive sampling of children undergoing in-clinic urotherapy group training. In total, 19 participants (13 boys and 6 girls) aged 9-13 years took part in focus groups of 3 to 4 children, held at the hospital. A child-friendly focus group toolkit was used to facilitate discussion through creative and playful exercises. A total of 7 focus groups were conducted, including 2 repeated sessions, until thematic saturation was reached. All sessions were held in Dutch, video- and audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. An inductive conventional content analysis was conducted using a dual-coder approach to identify and iteratively refine emerging themes.

Four themes emerged: (1) attitudes and motivation: ranging from willingness to engage in urotherapy and use tools to reluctance or resistance; (2) social acceptance: highlighting the impact of peer perception, fear of being bullied, and opportunities to break the taboo and reframe tools as socially desirable; (3) contextual influences: including dissatisfaction with school toilets and limited child involvement at doctor visits, contrasted with the positive peer support experienced during group therapy; and (4) digital integration: children saw many traditional tools as outdated and suggested gamified, smart alternatives. The drawings created by children during the exercises served as a creative reflection of these thematic findings.

Involving children in research and design is essential for creating interventions that are truly child-centered. Through creative, qualitative methods, this study uncovered rich insights into children’s experiences with urotherapy tools, pointing to 4 key design priorities: personalization, stigma-free design, adaptability, and digital innovation.