Bridging Surgical Outcomes and Patient Experience: A Questionnaire-Based Evaluation of Buccal Mucosal Graft Morbidity Following Substitution Urethroplasty
Zakaria W Shkoukani, Abdul Rauf, Mohamed Abdulmajed, Ahmad Omar, Michael St Floyd

TL;DR
This study evaluates patient-reported oral discomfort after using cheek tissue grafts for urethral surgery, finding low pain and high satisfaction.
Contribution
The study introduces a dedicated questionnaire to assess donor site morbidity after buccal mucosal graft harvesting.
Findings
Most patients reported low pain scores (≤2/10) after buccal mucosal graft harvesting.
84.3% of patients resumed normal diet by postoperative day two.
Transient oral issues like trismus and paraesthesia resolved by day 10 with no significant association to graft characteristics.
Abstract
Introduction Urethroplasty remains the gold standard for managing complex urethral stricture disease (USD). Buccal mucosa grafts (BMG) are the preferred graft material due to low morbidity and ease of harvest. However, specific donor site morbidity remains underexplored. This study prospectively evaluates oral morbidity following BMG harvest through use of a dedicated questionnaire. Methods All patients undergoing urethral reconstruction with BMG were prospectively enrolled. Demographic data, stricture characteristics, graft dimensions and operative details were recorded. At postoperative day 10, a six-item questionnaire was utilised to assess oral pain scores, resumption of normal diet, paraesthesia, trismus, and overall patient satisfaction. Data was analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results Sixty-four BMGs were harvested, including three bilateral cases.…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsUrological Disorders and Treatments · Ureteral procedures and complications · Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
