# A Comparison of High-Impulse and Direct-Current Magnetron Sputtering Processes for the Formation of Effective Bactericidal Oxide Coatings on Polymer Substrates

**Authors:** Joanna Kacprzyńska-Gołacka, Piotr Wieciński, Bogusława Adamczyk-Cieślak, Sylwia Sowa, Wioletta Barszcz, Monika Łożyńska, Marek Kalbarczyk, Andrzej Krasiński, Halina Garbacz, Jerzy Smolik

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/ma18194591 · 2025-10-03

## TL;DR

This study compares two sputtering methods for creating bactericidal oxide coatings on polymer and metal substrates, finding that HIPIMS produces coatings with better mechanical and antimicrobial properties.

## Contribution

The paper introduces HIPIMS as a superior method for depositing AgO and CuO coatings with enhanced mechanical and antimicrobial performance compared to DCMS.

## Key findings

- HIPIMS-deposited AgO and CuO coatings are thinner, denser, and harder than those from DCMS.
- HIPIMS coatings show 50% higher hardness for AgO and 24% for CuO compared to DCMS coatings.
- Both HIPIMS and DCMS coatings achieve 100% bacterial viability reduction and hydrophobic properties.

## Abstract

In this paper, silver oxide (AgO) and copper oxide (CuO) coatings are placed on a single sputtering target with the direct-current magnetron sputtering (DCMS) and high-power impulse magnetron sputtering (HIPIMS) methods. All the tested coatings are obtained in a reactive process using a metallic target made by the Kurt Lesker company. The investigated coatings are deposited at room temperature on substrates made of pure iron (ARMCO) and polypropylene (PP) without substrate polarization. The deposition time for all the coatings is the same. The results of SEM and TEM investigations clearly show that using the HIPIMS method for the deposition of AgO and CuO coatings reduces their thickness and increases their structure density. Coatings produced with the HIPIMS method are characterized by a higher hardness and Young’s modulus. The value of hardness for AgO and CuO coatings deposited by the HIPIMS method is around 50% higher for AgO coatings and around 24% higher for CuO coatings compared to the coatings obtained by the DC method. This is also true of Young’s modulus values, which are around 30% higher for AgO coatings and 15% higher for CuO coatings produced by the HIPIMS method compared to those of coatings obtained with the DC method. AgO and CuO coatings deposited with both the methods (HIPIMS and DCMS) showed 100% reduction in the viability of two reference laboratory bacteria strains—Escherichia coli (Gram−) and Staphylococcus aureus (Gram+)—on both types of substrates. Additionally, these coatings are characterized by their hydrophobic properties, which means that they can create a protective barrier, making it difficult for bacteria to stick to the surface, limiting their development and preventing the phenomenon of biofouling. The HIPIMS technology allows for the deposition of coatings with better mechanical properties than those produced with the DCMS method, which means that they are more resistant to brittle fractures and wear and have very good antimicrobial properties.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** silver oxide (PubChem CID 92152), copper oxide (PubChem CID 14829)
- **Species:** Escherichia coli (taxon 562), Staphylococcus aureus (taxon 1280)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** ARMCO (-), PP (MESH:D011126), Oxide (MESH:D010087), Polymer (MESH:D011108), iron (MESH:D007501), silver oxide (MESH:C040225), CuO (MESH:C030973)
- **Species:** Escherichia coli (E. coli, species) [taxon 562], Bacteria Latreille et al. 1825 (Bacteria stick insect, genus) [taxon 629395], Staphylococcus aureus (species) [taxon 1280]

## Figures

14 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12526469/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12526469