# Replacing Sedentary Time with Physical Activity and Sleep: A 24-Hour Movement Behaviour Perspective on Appetite Control

**Authors:** Sundus Malaikah, Arwa Alruwaili, James P. Sanders, Alice E. Thackray, David J. Stensel, David Thivel, Joseph Henson, Alex V. Rowlands, Scott A. Willis, James A. King

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/nu17193163 · 2025-10-07

## TL;DR

Replacing sedentary time with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity increases energy intake and alters appetite-related hormones, but not when replacing with light activity or sleep.

## Contribution

This study explores how reallocating sedentary time to different activities affects appetite and energy intake in free-living conditions.

## Key findings

- Replacing sedentary time with MVPA increased energy intake and altered hunger and fullness perceptions.
- MVPA was linked to higher ghrelin and lower PYY levels, suggesting physiological compensation.
- Reallocating time to LPA or sleep had no significant effects on appetite or energy intake.

## Abstract

Background: Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep are interdependent components of the 24 h movement profile that may influence appetite control. While acute exercise can alter appetite perceptions and food reward, less is known about how reallocating time between daily behaviours affects appetite outcomes under free-living conditions. Methods: We applied isotemporal-substitution modelling in a cross-sectional study of 130 young, healthy, active adults. Accelerometer-derived estimates of sedentary time, light physical activity (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and sleep were analysed in relation to energy intake (food diaries, laboratory meals), subjective appetite perceptions, appetite-related hormones (acylated ghrelin, PYY, leptin), and psychological traits, including food reward (Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire, LFPQ), food cravings (Control of Eating Questionnaire, CoEQ), and eating behaviour traits (Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire, TFEQ). Results: Reallocating 30 min/day of sedentary time to MVPA was associated with higher energy intake in free-living (+113 kcal/day, 95% CI: 34–192) and laboratory settings (+120 kcal/day, 95% CI: 55–185), along with greater postprandial hunger and prospective food consumption, reduced fullness, elevated fasting acylated ghrelin, and lower postprandial PYY. No associations were observed for reallocations to LPA or sleep. Furthermore, sedentary time reallocations were unrelated to leptin or psychological eating traits assessed by the LFPQ, CoEQ, or TFEQ. Conclusions: In this population, reallocating sedentary time to MVPA was linked to physiological and behavioural compensation consistent with elevated energy demands, whereas reallocating to LPA or sleep showed no associations. Trait-level eating behaviours were unaffected, suggesting MVPA influences appetite primarily through acute physiological rather than enduring cognitive or hedonic pathways.

## Linked entities

- **Proteins:** PYY (peptide YY), lepa (leptin a)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** PYY (peptide YY) [NCBI Gene 5697] {aka PYY-I, PYY1}, LEP (leptin) [NCBI Gene 3952] {aka LEPD, OB, OBS}
- **Chemicals:** acylated ghrelin (-)

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12526340/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12526340