Comparison of Cu(II) Adsorption Using Fly Ash and Natural Sorbents During Temperature Change and Thermal–Alkaline Treatment

TL;DR

This paper compares how well fly ash and natural materials can remove copper from mine water, especially after temperature and chemical treatments.

Contribution

The study introduces a new thermal-alkaline modification method and uses fly ash from biomass combustion for Cu(II) adsorption.

Findings

Modified adsorbents improved Cu(II) removal efficiency across all concentrations.

Fly ash's Cu(II) adsorption capacity was comparable to natural sorbents.

Adsorption processes followed pseudo-second-order kinetics.

Abstract

Mine effluents represent a serious environmental problem on a global scale. Therefore, the effective treatment of this water is a serious issue in the scientific field. The adsorption process seems to be one of the attractive methods, especially due to the simplicity of design, affordability or high efficiency. The latest scientific knowledge has shown that the use of waste and natural adsorbents is economical and effective. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the adsorption process of natural and waste materials—zeolite, bentonite and fly ash—under the influence of temperature and modification of these adsorbents. The novelty of this study resides in an adjustment of the modification method of adsorbents compared to previous research: thermal–alkaline treatment versus hydrothermal one. Another novelty is the use of modified fly ash from biomass combustion as an adsorbent in comparison with the previously used fly ash from coal combustion. The modification of the adsorbents made the adsorption process more effective at all experimental concentrations. The characterisation of adsorbent samples was performed using X-ray diffraction (XRD). The parameters of the adsorption isotherms, Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin, were estimated by nonlinear regression analysis. The adsorption capacity of Cu(II) of fly ash was comparable to natural adsorbents. Adsorption processes were better described by pseudo-second-order kinetics. At the end of this study, the suitability of using the adsorbents to reduce the concentration of Cu(II) in neutral mine effluents was observed in the following order at 30 °C: unmodified fly ash > modified bentonite > unmodified zeolite. At the temperatures of 20 °C and 10 °C, the same trend of the suitability of adsorbents use was confirmed: modified bentonite > modified zeolite > modified fly ash. The practical applicability of this study lies in the expansion of knowledge in the field of adsorption processes and in the improvement of waste management efficiency of heating plants not only in Slovakia, but also globally.

Figures