# Effects of a Standing Program for Ambulatory Children with Myelomeningocele: A Single-Subject Design

## TL;DR

A standing program improved muscle flexibility and movement quality in ambulatory children with myelomeningocele, but more research is needed.

## Contribution

This study provides evidence for the effectiveness of home-based standing programs in ambulatory children with myelomeningocele.

## Key findings

- Improvements in hip and knee muscle flexibility were observed during the intervention phases.
- Functional movement quality improved in both children, but gait velocity and daily activity scores remained stable.
- Parental feedback indicated increased independence and high engagement with the home program.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Children with myelomeningocele (MMC) often experience lower extremity muscular contractures, which can impact their functional mobility. While standing programs have demonstrated benefits for children with other neuromuscular conditions, there is limited evidence on their use in ambulatory children with MMC who have joint deformities. This single-subject design study examined the impact of a home-based standing program on two ambulatory children with MMC, focusing on lower extremity muscle flexibility, functional movement quality, gait velocity, and participation in daily activities. Methods: Two children participated in a multi-phase single-subject (ABABA) withdrawal design beginning with the baseline phase and then alternating between the intervention and withdrawal phases. The intervention consisted of 60-minute standing sessions, five days a week, using a sit-to-stand stander (STSS) with support and supervision from a physical therapist (PT) and the parent. Primary outcomes included goniometric passive range of motion (PROM) and 10-Meter Walk Test (10 MWT). Secondary outcomes included the Pediatric Neuromuscular Recovery Scale (Peds NRS) and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT). Results: Improvements in hip and knee muscle flexibility were observed during the intervention phases, with some loss during the withdrawal phase. Functional movement quality improved in both children. Gait velocity and participation in daily activity scores remained stable during intervention phases. Parental feedback reflected increased independence and high engagement with the home program. One child discontinued due to a heel injury, highlighting the need for individualized support. Conclusions: Personalized standing programs may improve muscle flexibility and functional movement quality in ambulatory children with MMC. Further research is warranted to determine the optimal dosing regimen, ensure safety, and assess long-term functional outcomes.