# Primary Care Providers Describe Barriers and Facilitators to Amputation Prevention in Oklahoma

## TL;DR

Primary care providers in Oklahoma face challenges in preventing amputations due to limited access to specialists and social barriers, but they suggest education and systemic changes could help.

## Contribution

This study provides new insights into barriers and facilitators to amputation prevention from primary care providers' perspectives in Oklahoma.

## Key findings

- Most PCPs see at-risk limbs at least once every 1–2 months.
- Limited access to specialty care and patient social struggles are major barriers to limb preservation.
- Facilitators include patient advocates, affordable medications, and more time with patients.

## Abstract

Background: Although most amputations caused by diabetes and peripheral artery disease (PAD) are preventable, current limb preservation efforts in the United States remain poorly understood. This study aims to identify key barriers and facilitators to limb preservation from the primary care provider (PCP) perspective. We plan to use the insights from this work to promote targeted intervention strategies. Methods: Using a mixed-methods design, an online 5–10 min survey was distributed to Oklahoma primary care providers who could elect to participate further in a semi-structured, audio-recorded interview. Descriptive analysis was used to summarize survey results. Interviews were transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using grounded theory. Donabedian’s structure, process, and outcome framework was used to categorize how each identified barrier and facilitator increases or reduces the risk of limb loss for at-risk patients at the practice level. Finally, we compared and contrasted survey and interview findings. Results: Thirty surveys were completed (approximately 14% response rate), and seven interviews were conducted with PCPs geographically dispersed across Oklahoma. Most clinicians reported in the survey that they see at-risk limbs at least once every 1–2 months (n = 29, 96.7%). Half of clinicians were satisfied or very satisfied with access to vascular surgery (n = 15, 50.0%), interventional specialists (n = 13, 43.3%), and endocrinologists (n = 12, 40.0%). Finally, survey respondents reported that social needs most often affecting their patients with a limb at risk of amputation include income, health education, transportation, and health insurance. Interviews confirmed PCPs frequently see at-risk limbs. We identified thematic barriers to limb preservation that included limited access to specialty care, limited PCP and patient amputation prevention education, and patient social struggles surrounding transportation, finances, and insurance. Patient advocates (community, clinical, or personal), affordable medications, and more time with patients were reported as facilitators in amputation prevention. Conclusions: Oklahoma PCPs frequently see at-risk feet, realize poor access to care, and desire structural change to support excellent preventive care in diabetes and PAD. Limb preservation in Oklahoma is contingent upon shifting from disempowerment to engagement that requires systemic reform, clinical innovation, and community engagement. We identified several intervention strategies, including increasing education for PCPs to empower them to initiate early prevention, improving early identification and preventive therapy for patients at risk for limb loss, and cultivating specialty care access via networking and policy change.