Comparison Between Surgical and Percutaneous Paddles in Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Pain
Marta Antonia Gómez-González, Nicolás Cordero-Tous, Carlos Sánchez-Corral, Beatriz Lechuga-Carrasco, Manuel Alejandro Sánchez-García, Rafael Gálvez-Mateos, Gonzalo Olivares-Granados

TL;DR
This study compares surgical and percutaneous leads used in spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain, finding similar pain control but higher migration rates in percutaneous leads.
Contribution
The study provides a comparative analysis of surgical and percutaneous leads in spinal cord stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain using a long-term observational dataset.
Findings
No significant differences in pain control between surgical and percutaneous leads.
Percutaneous leads showed a higher lead migration rate.
Switching from percutaneous to surgical leads showed better pain relief in some patients.
Abstract
Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established treatment for chronic neuropathic pain, offering a safe procedure with low complication rates. Both surgical and percutaneous leads can be effective, with similar complication rates. Methods: We analyzed all patients implanted at a reference center since 1996 to compare pain control and complications and determine whether one system was more effective than the other in patients who had experienced both systems. A retrospective observational study was designed. Results: A total of 188 SCS systems were implanted, with a follow-up period of 79.71 ± 60.39 months (mean ± SD). We analyzed data from 106 males (56.38%) and 82 females (43.62%), ranging from 15 to 76 years old. A total of 68 (36.17%) surgical leads and 120 (63.83%) percutaneous leads were implanted for failed back syndrome (120, 63.83%), complex regional pain…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPain Management and Treatment · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
