# Prognostic Significance of Isolated Low-Frequency Hearing Loss: A Longitudinal Audiometric Study

## TL;DR

This study finds that high-frequency hearing loss is a strong predictor of long-term hearing decline, while isolated low-frequency hearing loss does not increase risk.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence on the long-term prognostic value of frequency-specific hearing loss patterns in adults.

## Key findings

- High-frequency hearing loss significantly increases the risk of long-term hearing deterioration.
- Combined-frequency hearing loss shows the most extensive deterioration compared to normal hearing.
- Isolated low-frequency hearing loss is not associated with increased long-term hearing loss risk.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Hearing loss is a prevalent sensory impairment in older adults, linked to reduced quality of life, cognitive decline, and social isolation. While it usually begins in the high-frequency range, some individuals present with isolated low-frequency hearing loss (LFHL). The long-term prognostic implications of such frequency-specific patterns remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of long-term hearing deterioration by initial hearing loss type: LFHL, high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL), and combined-frequency hearing loss (CFHL). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed pure-tone audiometry (PTA) data from 10,261 patients who underwent at least two pure-tone audiometry assessments between 2011 and 2022 at a tertiary hospital. Each ear was treated as an independent observation. Hearing loss was defined as a threshold > 20 dB HL at 250, 500, 4000, or 8000 Hz. Participants were classified into normal hearing (NH), LFHL, HFHL, and CFHL groups. The outcome was a final four-frequency pure-tone average (4PTA) ≥ 40 dB HL. Logistic regression adjusted for age and sex was used, with subgroup analyses by follow-up duration. Results: HFHL (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.47–1.89) and CFHL (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.97–2.53) showed significantly higher risks of hearing loss compared with NH. LFHL did not show a significant increase (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.76–1.16). These results were consistent across follow-up durations, with CFHL showing the most extensive deterioration. Conclusion: HFHL is a strong predictor of long-term auditory decline, and risk is further elevated with CFHL. In contrast, isolated LFHL was not associated with increased risk, suggesting relatively favorable outcomes. Frequency-specific classification may aid risk stratification and long-term monitoring strategies.