Comparative Proteomics, Functional Characterization and Immunological Cross-Reactivity Studies on Russell’s Viper Venom from Two Distinct Geographical Regions in South India
Nisha Reghu, Sudharshan Rao, Dileepkumar Raveendran, Bipin Gopalakrishnan Nair, Muralidharan Vanuopadath

TL;DR
This study compares venom from Russell’s vipers in Kerala and Tamil Nadu, finding differences in protein composition and antivenom effectiveness.
Contribution
The study provides the first proteomic and functional comparison of Russell’s viper venom from Kerala and Tamil Nadu, revealing geographic variation in venom composition and antivenom cross-reactivity.
Findings
RVwg venom contains unique proteins like DNase, hyaluronidase, and vascular endothelial growth factor not found in RVi venom.
RVwg venom showed higher fibrinogenolytic and hyaluronidase activities, while RVi venom had higher phospholipase A2 and L-amino acid oxidase activities.
Antivenom cross-reactivity varied significantly between venoms, with some antivenoms showing better binding to RVwg venom.
Abstract
Snakebite envenoming is a neglected tropical disease contributing to a significant number of morbidities and mortalities globally. Reports indicate that venom variation influences antivenom efficacy, which might affect treatment outcomes. The venom composition of Daboia russelii (Russell’s viper), one of the big four snakes in India, has been extensively studied from different geographical regions of India. Nonetheless, the Russell’s viper venom proteome from Kerala (Western Ghats region), together with its study in comparison with the same species’ venom from Tamil Nadu, has not been explored yet. In the current study, Daboia russelii venom from Irula (RVi) and the Western Ghats region in Kerala (RVwg) was characterized through mass spectrometry-based proteomics and few functional assays. The proteomics study identified 52 proteins from 14 snake protein families in RVi and 61 proteins…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVenomous Animal Envenomation and Studies · Rabies epidemiology and control · Amphibian and Reptile Biology
