# The Mistletoe and Breast Cancer (MAB) Study: A UK Mixed-Phase, Pilot, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial

**Authors:** Lorna J. Duncan, Susan Bryant, Gene Feder, Maria Gresham, Poppy Gibson, Debbie Sharp, Jeremy P. Braybrooke, Alyson L. Huntley

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/cancers17193169 · Cancers · 2025-09-29

## TL;DR

This UK pilot study explores the feasibility of using mistletoe as a supportive therapy for breast cancer patients alongside conventional treatments.

## Contribution

The study is the first to evaluate mistletoe therapy in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial within the UK NHS setting.

## Key findings

- Recruitment was challenging, with only 14 participants randomised out of 67 approached.
- Participants showed good adherence to the study therapy but faced difficulties with injections and skin reactions.
- Twenty-two adverse events were reported, primarily related to the mistletoe therapy injections.

## Abstract

The Mistletoe and Breast Cancer (MAB) randomised placebo-controlled, double-blind trial investigates the feasibility of the use of the herbal medicine mistletoe (Viscum album) as an adjunct supportive therapy alongside conventional cancer treatment within the National Health Service in the United Kingdom.

Background/Objective: To test the feasibility of a mixed-phase, pilot, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of mistletoe therapy (MT) with an embedded qualitative study in the UK National Health Service (NHS) setting. Methods: The aim was to recruit 45 patients via an NHS oncology centre with a diagnosis of early or locally advanced breast cancer. Participants were allocated to Iscador® Malus, Iscador® Pinus, or physiological saline (placebo). Diaries and quality-of-life questionnaires were administered. Qualitative interviews were conducted with participants, oncologists, and nurses. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment, retention, adherence, blinding, and safety. Results: Sixty-seven patients were approached between August 2019 and March 2020, 15 gave consent, 14 participants were randomised, and 2 withdrew during the trial. Ten participants and five staff were interviewed. Barriers to recruitment were the additional treatments/time, extra injections, and the possibility of placebo allocation. Adherence was very good whilst the participants were on the study therapy. Diaries and interviews indicated that 11/14 participants struggled with injections and skin reactions. There were 22 adverse events due to the MT, related to the injections or skin reactions. Conclusion: This pilot study examined the feasibility of conducting a randomised placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of mistletoe therapy for breast cancer patients within the UK NHS. The results describe the challenges and achievements of recruitment, retention, adherence, blinding, and safety in this context.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** breast cancer (MONDO:0004989)
- **Species:** Viscum album (taxon 3972)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** skin reactions (MESH:D012871), MAB (MESH:D001943)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12524002/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12524002/full.md

## References

33 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12524002/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12524002