Utilization of Exception Requests After Implementation of the National Heart Review Board for Pediatrics
Rachel E. Harris, David W. Bearl, Lydia K. Wright

TL;DR
A study found that most heart transplant exception requests for children followed guidelines and had high approval rates, but exceptions outside the guidelines were also frequently approved.
Contribution
This study evaluates the utilization and approval rates of heart transplant exception requests after the implementation of a national pediatric review board.
Findings
The overall approval rate of exception requests was 91%.
1A exceptions following guidance had a significantly higher approval rate (97%) compared to those not following guidance (62%).
Most 1B exceptions were for single ventricle congenital heart disease, despite limited guidance for other conditions like cardiomyopathy.
Abstract
In 2020, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network authorized the creation of a National Heart Review Board for Pediatrics along with a guidance document. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utilization of exception requests and approval rates after the implementation of the new review board. This was a retrospective review of 1A and 1B exception requests between June 2021 and January 2023. Exception request narratives were reviewed to determine if the request followed guidance and then analyzed the frequency of those approved by diagnosis. There were 591 exception requests submitted for 419 candidates with an overall approval rate of 91%. Only 55% of the exceptions followed the guidance, but of those, 97% were approved. Exceptions submitted that did not follow the guidance had a lower approval rate of 85%. 1A exception requests that followed the guidance were…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHealthcare Policy and Management · Health Sciences Research and Education · Innovations in Medical Education
