Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NBRC 0203 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus NBRC 3425 as a silage additive for all animal species (EM‐Agriton B.V.)
Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López‐Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto‐Maradona, Ilen Röhe

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the safety and effectiveness of a feed additive containing two microorganisms for improving silage quality in animal feed.
Contribution
The study confirms the safety and efficacy of using Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus as a silage additive for all animal species.
Findings
The additive is safe for animals, consumers, and the environment.
It can improve silage production and fermentation quality for plant material with 31-51% dry matter.
Inhalation and dermal exposure are identified as potential risks for users.
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the additive consisting of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NBRC 0203 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus NBRC 3425 when used as a technological additive to improve ensiling of all fresh plant material for all animal species at a proposed minimum concentration of 4.0 × 102 and 3.2 × 106 colony forming units (CFU)/kg fresh plant material, respectively. The bacterial species S. cerevisiae and L. rhamnosus are considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety approach to safety assessment. The identity of the strains was established, the absence of resistance to antimycotics was confirmed for S. cerevisiae and no acquired antimicrobial resistance genes were detected in L. rhamnosus. Therefore, the FEEDAP Panel concluded that the use of both strains as a silage additive is…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAgricultural safety and regulations · Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety · Genetically Modified Organisms Research
