Safety evaluation of the food enzyme containing β‐fructofuranosidase and β‐glucosidase activities from the non‐genetically modified Aspergillus tubingensis strain IN 319
Holger Zorn, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Francesco Catania, Gabriele Gadermaier, Ralf Greiner, Baltasar Mayo, Alicja Mortensen, Yrjö Henrik Roos, Marize L. M. Solano, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Ana Criado, Jaime Aguilera, Magdalena Andryszkiewicz

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the safety of a food enzyme from Aspergillus tubingensis, concluding it is safe for use in food manufacturing.
Contribution
A safety assessment of a novel food enzyme from a non-genetically modified fungal strain is presented.
Findings
The enzyme is free from viable cells and safe for six food manufacturing processes.
Dietary exposure was estimated up to 1.832 mg TOS/kg body weight per day.
Genotoxicity tests showed no safety concerns, and a margin of exposure of at least 582 was found.
Abstract
The food enzyme containing β‐fructofuranosidase (β‐d‐fructofuranoside fructohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.26) and β‐glucosidase (β‐d‐glucoside glucohydrolase; EC 3.2.1.21) activities is produced with the non‐genetically modified Aspergillus tubingensis strain IN 319 by Shin Nihon Chemical Co., Ltd. The food enzyme is free from viable cells of the production organism. The food enzyme is intended to be used in six food manufacturing processes. Since residual amounts of food enzyme–total organic solids (TOS) are removed in one process, dietary exposure was calculated only for the remaining five food manufacturing processes. It was estimated to be up to 1.832 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. Genotoxicity tests did not indicate a safety concern. The Panel identified a no observed adverse effect level of 1067 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested, which when compared…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOccupational exposure and asthma · Agricultural safety and regulations · Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
