# Approaches for retraining sEMG classifiers for upper-limb prostheses

**Authors:** Tom Donnelly, Elena Seminati, Benjamin Metcalfe

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2025.1627872 · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · 2025-10-01

## TL;DR

This paper explores methods to improve the performance of machine learning classifiers used in myoelectric prostheses by retraining them to handle signal variability.

## Contribution

The study introduces a novel signal-to-noise ratio-based retraining method for improving classifier accuracy in myoelectric prostheses.

## Key findings

- All retraining paradigms improved classification accuracy compared to no retraining.
- Nearest neighbor and signal-to-noise ratio methods outperformed confidence-based retraining by 5% on average.
- Results were evaluated using 10 sessions from the NinaPro 6 dataset over 5 days.

## Abstract

Abandonment rates for myoelectric upper limb prostheses can reach 44%, negatively affecting quality of life and increasing the risk of injury due to compensatory movements. Traditional myoelectric prostheses rely on conventional signal processing for the detection and classification of movement intentions, whereas machine learning offers more robust and complex control through pattern recognition. However, the non-stationary nature of surface electromyogram signals and their day-to-day variations significantly degrade the classification performance of machine learning algorithms. Although single-session classification accuracies exceeding 99% have been reported for 8-class datasets, multisession accuracies typically decrease by 23% between morning and afternoon sessions. Retraining or adaptation can mitigate this accuracy loss.

This study evaluates three paradigms for retraining a machine learning-based classifier: confidence scores, nearest neighbour window assessment, and a novel signal-to-noise ratio-based approach.

The results show that all paradigms improve accuracy against no retraining, with the nearest neighbour and signal-to-noise ratio methods showing an average improvement 5% in accuracy over the confidence-based approach.

The effectiveness of each paradigm is assessed based on intersession accuracy across 10 sessions recorded over 5 days using the NinaPro 6 dataset.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** injury (MESH:D014947)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12521216/full.md

## Figures

11 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12521216/full.md

## References

43 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12521216/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12521216