# Risk prediction models for enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients: an overview of systematic reviews

**Authors:** Zhenfeng Zhou, Jicheng Zhang, Chunmei Fan, Zhengang Wei, Qi Wang, Congcong Liu

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1662409 · Frontiers in Nutrition · 2025-10-01

## TL;DR

This study reviews risk prediction models for feeding intolerance in critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition and finds a need for better standards.

## Contribution

The study identifies gaps in the quality and validation of prediction models for enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in ICU patients.

## Key findings

- Most prediction models (61.7%) had internal validation, but only 31.3% had external validation.
- Systematic reviews showed high overall risk of bias, with only two rated as low risk.
- The study highlights the lack of standardized reporting and quality criteria for these models.

## Abstract

To evaluate the systematic reviews of a risk prediction model for enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients.

We registered the protocol for this overview in PROSPERO. Computer searches were conducted on the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase databases China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database and SinoMed to search for systematic reviews related to the study. Two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted information, and used the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS) tool to assess the risk of bias of the retrieved systematic reviews.

Eight systematic reviews were included, total of 115 prediction models, with more than half of the predictive models (71/115 = 61.7%) having undergone internal validation and a small number (36/115 = 31.3%) having undergone external validation. Of the quality evaluations, two were at low risk of bias, six were at high risk, and the overall risk of bias was high.

The completeness of reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews of prediction models for enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in critically ill patients were inconsistent and lacked specific quality standards. There is an urgent need for standardized reporting and quality criteria to improve the quality of prediction models for enteral nutrition feeding intolerance in ICU patients.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** critically ill (MESH:D016638)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12520958/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12520958/full.md

## References

55 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12520958/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12520958