# Religiousness Measured by the Four Basic Dimensions of Religiousness Scale (4-BDRS) among Polish Believers: Measurement Quality, Personality and Well-being Correlates

**Authors:** Piotr Szydłowski, Ewa Topolewska-Siedzik, Jan Cieciuch

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s10943-025-02450-z · 2025-09-23

## TL;DR

This study examines a Polish version of a religiousness scale and finds that religious dimensions like belonging and bonding are most linked to well-being.

## Contribution

The study introduces a validated Polish version of the 4-BDRS and explores its correlations with personality and well-being.

## Key findings

- The 4-BDRS showed good reliability and validity in the Polish context.
- Religious dimensions like belonging and bonding were more strongly linked to well-being than believing and behaving.
- Scale scores increased with age, and all dimensions correlated with socialization traits and well-being.

## Abstract

The Four Basic Dimensions of Religiousness Scale (4-BDRS) was developed within the framework of cross-cultural psychology to measure four universal dimensions of religiousness: believing, bonding, belonging, and behaving. This paper presents the Polish version of the 4-BDRS and reports two studies that examined its measurement quality and the personality and well-being correlates of these dimensions. The scale has demonstrated satisfactory reliability and factorial validity. All dimensions showed theoretically consistent associations with the other measures of religiousness. No significant gender differences (or only weak effects) were found across the four dimensions, whereas the scale scores significantly increased with age. All dimensions were positively related to the personality traits associated with socialization (stability). Moreover, all the dimensions showed a positive association with well-being. Belonging and bonding were more strongly related to well-being than believing and behaving. Specifically, belonging was the most crucial dimension for general and social well-being, whereas bonding was the most important dimension for emotional and psychological well-being. The theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** decreased well-being (MESH:C536693), CPM (MESH:D010554), disability (MESH:D009069), CRM (MESH:D007942), CMC (OMIM:163000)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12518467/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12518467