# Kinetics of IgA Subtypes and Cytokines in Respiratory Secretions Following Immunization With COVID‐19 Mucosal Vaccine

**Authors:** Weixin Chen, Juan Li, Shuang Bai, Ao Zhang, Qun Zheng, Junnan Zhang, Wenwen Lan, Yihan Zhang, Wei Yao, Wei Zhao, Jiang Wu

PMC · DOI: 10.1002/jmv.70638 · Journal of Medical Virology · 2025-10-13

## TL;DR

This study compares two mucosal COVID-19 vaccines and finds that one induces stronger and longer-lasting IgA antibodies in respiratory secretions.

## Contribution

The study reveals distinct IgA subclass dynamics in upper and lower respiratory tracts following mucosal vaccination.

## Key findings

- The orally aerosolized vaccine showed higher IgA positive conversion rates in nasal and sputum secretions compared to the intranasal vaccine.
- The orally aerosolized vaccine induced sustained IgA2 dominance in sputum at 6 months, while the intranasal vaccine showed transient IgA1 predominance.
- Only IL-6 cytokine levels showed significant variation between the two vaccine groups.

## Abstract

The COVID‐19 pandemic highlights the need for mucosal vaccines inducing respiratory secretory IgA (sIgA), as traditional intramuscular vaccines primarily elicit systemic IgG with limited mucosal protection. This study systematically compared mucosal immune responses induced by two authorized COVID‐19 mucosal vaccines: an orally aerosolized adenovirus vector‐based vaccine (Ad5‐nCoV) and an intranasal live‐attenuated influenza virus vector‐based vaccine (dNS1‐RBD). We longitudinally assessed IgA, IgA1, and IgA2 antibody titers against SARS‐CoV‐2 RBD/Spike protein, alongside cytokine profiles, in nasal secretions and sputum from 40 participants at 7, 14, 28 days, and 3/6 months post‐immunization. The orally aerosolized vaccine exhibited superior mucosal immunogenicity, with peak IgA positive conversion rate of 50% (nasal) and 65% (sputum) vs. 30% (nasal) and 40% (sputum) for the intranasal vaccine. Notably, the orally aerosolized vaccine induced sustained IgA2 dominance (> 50%) in sputum at 6 months, whereas the intranasal vaccine showed transient IgA1 predominance followed by decline. Despite these differences, both vaccines elicited modest overall mucosal responses, with only IL‐6 showing significant intergroup variation (p < 0.01). This is a study to demonstrate compartmentalized IgA subclass dynamics between upper (nasal) and lower (sputum) respiratory tracts following mucosal vaccination. Our findings highlight the need for optimized mucosal vaccine formulations to enhance respiratory immunity, providing critical insights for developing next‐generation COVID‐19 vaccines targeting the complex mucosal immune microenvironment.

## Linked entities

- **Proteins:** CD79A (CD79a molecule), IGHA1 (immunoglobulin heavy constant alpha 1), LOC101450618 (titin homolog), IL6 (interleukin 6)
- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MONDO:0100096)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** IL6 (interleukin 6) [NCBI Gene 3569] {aka BSF-2, BSF2, CDF, HGF, HSF, IFN-beta-2}, IGHA1 (immunoglobulin heavy constant alpha 1) [NCBI Gene 3493] {aka IgA1}, LOC102723407 (immunoglobulin heavy variable 4-38-2-like) [NCBI Gene 102723407] {aka IGHV4, IGHV4-30, IGHV4-38-2, IGHV4-39, IGHV4-b, IGVH4-39}, S (surface glycoprotein) [NCBI Gene 43740568] {aka spike glycoprotein}
- **Diseases:** COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382)
- **Chemicals:** dNS1 (-)
- **Species:** Adenoviridae (family) [taxon 10508], Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (no rank) [taxon 2697049]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12517115/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12517115/full.md

## References

34 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12517115/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12517115