Prevalence and associated factors of mental distress among private college nursing students in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia, 2023
Agegnehu Amare, Niguse Yigzaw, Bizuneh Tesfaye, Enguday Tirfeneh, Seblewongel Tinsae, Kiber Temesgen, Gebremeskel Mesafint

TL;DR
This study found that over half of private college nursing students in Ethiopia experience mental distress, with factors like poor social support and lack of exercise contributing to it.
Contribution
The study provides new prevalence data and identifies specific risk factors for mental distress among nursing students in Ethiopia.
Findings
52.7% of private college nursing students in Gondar town had mental distress.
Female sex, rural residence, and poor social support were significant risk factors for mental distress.
Regular physical exercise and access to counseling services were protective against mental distress.
Abstract
Mental distress (MD) refers to a range of troubling, confusing, or unusual internal experiences and symptoms that affect more than 25% of people during their lives. Students with mental distress are more likely to face negative outcomes, including impaired cognitive functioning, learning difficulties, poor academic performance, and substance use. This study aimed to address a research gap by estimating the prevalence of mental distress and identifying associated factors. An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Gondar town using a multistage stratified sampling technique. The Kessler 10-item scale was applied to assess the prevalence of mental distress. Bi-variable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, and variables with a p-value <0.05 in the multivariable model at a 95% confidence interval (CI) were considered statistically significant.…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Variables | Category | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | <=21 | 305 | 49.19 |
| >21 | 315 | 50.81 | |
| Sex | Male | 302 | 48.71 |
| Female | 318 | 51.29 | |
| Religion | Orthodox | 521 | 84.03 |
| Muslim | 63 | 10.16 | |
| Others* | 26 | 5.81 | |
| Spiritual practice | Yes | 575 | 92.74 |
| No | 45 | 7.26 | |
| Residency | Urban | 397 | 64.03 |
| Rural | 223 | 35.97 | |
| Living with | Both parent | 258 | 41.61 |
| Single parent | 123 | 19.84 | |
| Lonely | 146 | 23.55 | |
| With spouse | 51 | 8.23 | |
| With friends | 37 | 5.97 | |
| Others** | 5 | 0.81 | |
| Marital status | Single | 541 | 87.26 |
| Married | 52 | 8.39 | |
| Others*** | 27 | 4.36 | |
| Financial problem | Yes | 423 | 68.23 |
| No | 197 | 31.77 |
| Variables | Category | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year of study | 1st year | 148 | 23.87 |
| 2nd year | 186 | 30.00 | |
| 3rd year | 204 | 32.90 | |
| 4th year | 82 | 13.23 | |
| CGPA | Satisfactory (<2.5) | 50 | 8.06 |
| Distinction (>=2.5) | 157 | 25.32 | |
| Great distinction (>=3.00) | 212 | 34.19 | |
| Very great distinction (>=3.5) | 201 | 32.42 | |
| Good prospect to find a job | Yes | 484 | 78.06 |
| No | 136 | 21.94 |
| Variables | Category | Frequency | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol | Ever use | Yes | 427 | 68.87 |
| No | 193 | 31.13 | ||
| Current use | Yes | 374 | 60.32 | |
| No | 246 | 39.68 | ||
| Cigarette | Ever use | Yes | 11 | 1.77 |
| No | 609 | 98.23 | ||
| Current use | Yes | 9 | 1.45 | |
| No | 611 | 98.55 | ||
| Chat | Ever use | Yes | 21 | 3.39 |
| No | 599 | 96,61 | ||
| Current use | Yes | 16 | 2.58 | |
| No | 604 | 97.42 | ||
| Others* | Ever use | Yes | 6 | 0.97 |
| No | 614 | 99.03 | ||
| Current use | Yes | 4 | 0.65 | |
| No | 616 | 99.35 | ||
| Regular physical exercise | Yes | 59 | 9.52 | |
| No | 561 | 90.48 | ||
| Variables | Category | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social support | Poor | 201 | 32.42 |
| Moderate | 300 | 48.39 | |
| Strong | 119 | 19.19 | |
| Attending guidance and counseling | Yes | 115 | 18.55 |
| No | 57 | 9.19 | |
| Not available | 448 | 72.26 | |
| Family history of mental illness | Yes | 64 | 10.32 |
| No | 556 | 89.68 | |
| Chronic illness | Yes | 38 | 6.13 |
| No | 582 | 93.87 |
| Variables | Category | Mental distress | OR with 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | COR | AOR | ||
| Sex | Male | 134 | 168 | 1 | 1 |
| Female | 193 | 125 | 1.94(1.40,2.67) | 2.18(1.50,3.16) *** | |
| Religion | Orthodox | 275 | 246 | 1 | 1 |
| Muslim | 30 | 33 | 0.81(0.48,1.37) | 1.02(0.53,1.93) | |
| Protestant | 16 | 7 | 2.04(0.83,5.05) | 2.15(0.75,6.21) | |
| Others | 6 | 7 | 0.77(0.25,2.31) | 0.89(0.24,3.28) | |
| Spiritual practice | Yes | 299 | 276 | 1 | 1 |
| No | 17 | 28 | 1.52(0.81,2.84) | 1.29(0.68,2.86) | |
| Residency | Urban | 186 | 211 | 1 | 1 |
| Rural | 141 | 82 | 1.95(1.39,2.73) | 1.96(1.30,2.95) ** | |
| Living with | Both parent | 130 | 128 | 1 | 1 |
| Single parent | 73 | 50 | 1.44(0.93,2.22) | 1.50(0.90,2.50) | |
| Lonely | 82 | 64 | 1.26(0.84,1.90) | 1.03(0.64,1.65) | |
| With spouse | 22 | 29 | 0.75(0.41,1.37) | 0.83(0.41,1.66) | |
| With friends | 18 | 19 | 0.93(0.47,1.86) | 0.62(0.29,1.35) | |
| Others | 2 | 3 | 0.66(0.11,3.99) | 0.52(0.08,3.46) | |
| CGPA | Satisfactory | 30 | 20 | 1.67(0.89,3.14) | 1.38(0.66,2.90) |
| Distinction | 93 | 64 | 1.62(1.06,2.47) | 1.69(1.05,2.71) | |
| Great distinction | 109 | 103 | 1.18(0.80,1.74) | 1.10(0.72,1.69) | |
| Very great distinction | 95 | 106 | 1 | 1 | |
| Attending guidance and counseling | Yes | 48 | 67 | 1 | 1 |
| No | 37 | 20 | 2.58(1.34,4.99) | 2.36(1.12,4.99) * | |
| Not available | 242 | 206 | 1.64(1.08,2.48) | 1.52(0.94,2.43) | |
| Good prospect to find a job | Yes | 247 | 237 | 1 | 1 |
| No | 80 | 56 | 1.37(0.93,2.01) | 1.34(0.86,2.10) | |
| Alcohol ever use | Yes | 210 | 164 | 1.41(1.02,1.95) | 1.33(0.81,2.20) |
| No | 117 | 129 | 1 | 1 | |
| Alcohol current use | Yes | 147 | 107 | 1.42(1.03,1.96) | 1.51(0.92,2.47) |
| No | 180 | 186 | 1 | 1 | |
| Regular physical exercise | Yes | 19 | 40 | 1 | 1 |
| No | 308 | 253 | 2.56(1.45,4.54) | 3.28(1.68,6.37) *** | |
| Social support | Poor | 143 | 58 | 1.97(1.85,4.76) | 2.02(1.20,3.42) ** |
| Moderate | 170 | 130 | 0.92(0.60,1.41) | 0.78(0.49,1.24) | |
| Strong | 54 | 65 | 1 | 1 | |
| Family history of mental illness | Yes | 50 | 14 | 3.60(1.94,6.66) | 2.64(1.31,5.35) ** |
| No | 277 | 279 | 1 | 1 | |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMental Health Treatment and Access · Family Caregiving in Mental Illness · Health and Well-being Studies
Introduction
“Mental distress is a range of symptoms and experiences of a person’s internal life that are held to be troubling, confusing, or out of the ordinary” (1) mainly characterized by symptoms such as depression, anxiety, fatigue, insomnia, irritability, forgetfulness, difficulty concentrating, and somatic complaints including sleep problems, headache, and backache (2).
Mental distress is widespread globally; more than 25% of all individuals experience it during their lives (3). Although it affects individuals of all nations regardless of age, sex, or income, college students are particularly prone to negative mental health outcomes (4).
Previous studies have reported a higher prevalence of mental distress among university students in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, including Jizan (5), India (6) and Nigeria (7, 8). However, recent studies have also shown a sharp increase in prevalence in high-income countries (9–12).
In Ethiopia, two systematic reviews estimated a pooled prevalence of mental distress indicating that more than one-third of the students had mental distress (13, 14). Similarly, individual studies conducted in higher academic institutions reported prevalence ranging from 19.3% (15) and 53.2% (16–20).
Specifically, at the college level cross-sectional studies conducted in Southern Ethiopia (Hawassa) and Dessie showed that its prevalence was 22.30% and 16.2%, respectively (21, 22).
Although college can be an exciting time for most youth, previous research has demonstrated that the transition from high school to college can be stressful (3). Additionally, private college students often bear full responsibility for managing non-academic issues such as food, housing, transportation, stationery, tuition, and related costs. Many also rent homes and live in groups, which may further contribute to the development of mental distress.
Students with mental distress are more likely to face negative consequences such as impaired cognitive functioning, learning abilities, academic performance (23–25), emotional and interactional abilities (26–30) and are prone to substance abuse (9, 31). They are also at higher risk of depression and anxiety disorders (27), which may impair their functionality later in life (31–33). Early diagnosis and management of mental distress play a crucial role in achieving favorable outcomes (34).
Even though numerous studies have been conducted in Ethiopia to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of mental distress in higher academic institutions, there remains a significant information gap regarding its magnitude and determinants among private college nursing students. Therefore, this study aims to address this gap. Finally, the results of this study will also support educational and health bureaus in implementing early interventions.
Materials and methods
Study design, setting, and period
An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted from May/23/2023 to June/03/2023 among private college nursing students in Gondar, a town in Northwest Ethiopia. Gondar is the capital of the Central Gondar Administrative Zone and one of Ethiopia’s historic towns, located 657 km northwest of Addis Ababa. The town is home to nine private colleges with a total of 1,872 nursing students in the 2023 academic year.
Study populations
All undergraduate nursing students enrolled in private colleges in Gondar town constituted the study population.
Sample size and sampling techniques
The sample size was calculated using a single population proportion formula, with the following assumptions: a 50% expected proportion, 95% confidence interval (CI), 5% margin of error, 10% non-response rate, and design effect of 1.5. Accordingly, the final sample size was determined to be 636.
A stratified multistage sampling technique was used to select a representative sample of the study population. Initially, three colleges were randomly selected from the nine available using simple random sampling. The sample size of 636 was then proportionally allocated to each college. Finally, a computer-generated random sampling technique was applied to select the study subjects from each of the three colleges.
Data collection procedure and tools
Data were collected from the three randomly selected colleges using a structured, self-administered questionnaire consisting of five parts. The first part assessed socio-demographic and academic characteristics. The second part included the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10), which was used to measure the prevalence of mental distress. The K-10, developed based on item response theory models (35), consists of 10 questions assessing the frequency of non-specific mental distress during the past month (36). Each question has five possible responses, ranging from “none of the time” (score = 1) to “all of the time” (score = 5).
All responses to the K-10 were summed to obtain a total score. A score of <20 was considered normal, while a score ≥20 indicated the presence of mental distress (37). The tool has been validated by the World Health Organization (WHO) for use in developing countries (38) and has been validated for Ethiopian adults, demonstrating good reliability (39). Its sensitivity and specificity are 84.2% and 77.8%, respectively (40).
The third part of the questionnaire assessed behavioral factors, including substance use (current and lifetime use), which was adapted from the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST), a well-validated instrument developed by the WHO (41). The history of physical exercise was assessed using one question adapted from the Global School-based Health Survey (GSHS) questionnaire, developed by the WHO and the Centers for Disease Control (41) and Prevention (CDC).
The fourth part of the questionnaire addressed psychosocial factors. These included the level of social support, measured by the Oslo-3 scale, which has a total score range of 3–14 (42). This section also covered the availability and use of guidance and counseling services in the colleges, assessed with simple yes/no questions.
The final part of the questionnaire focused on clinical factors, including chronic medical illness and family (blood-related) history of mental illness, assessed with simple yes or no questions.
Data quality control
The questionnaire, originally prepared in English, was first translated into Amharic and then back-translated into English by independent individuals with the assistance of psychiatry professionals and returned-back to Amharic for the participants. The pre-test was done on 5% of the total sample size drawn from bazmarry college (one of the non-selected colleges) and the internal consistency of kessler-10 was checked by using Cronbach’s alpha reliability test with a score of 0.88.
Data were collected by three BSc-level psychiatric professionals and supervised by two additional BSc psychiatry professionals after two days of training on study instrument administration. During data collection, supervisors oversaw each site, and meetings were held among the data collectors, supervisors, and the principal investigator to review daily activities. Collected data were checked for completeness, and incomplete responses were discarded.
Data processing and analysis
After checking, coding, and entry into EpiData version 4.6.0.6, the data were exported to STATA version 14 for analysis. Socio-demographic characteristics and other factors were analyzed using descriptive statistics (percentages, means, and standard deviations).
Bivariable logistic regression analysis was first performed to identify associations between each independent variable and the outcome variable. Variables with a p-value <0.20 in the bivariable analysis were entered into the multivariable logistic regression model. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. Model fitness was evaluated using the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (p = 0.96) and there was no problem of multi-collinearity since every variable had a variance inflation factor (VIF) of less than five and a mean of 1.35.
Results
Socio-demographic characteristics of private college nursing students
Of the 636 nursing students approached, 620 provided informed consent and completed the survey, yielding a response rate of 97.5%. Nearly half of the participants, 302 (48.7%), were male. The mean (± SD) age of respondents was 21.86 ± 2.20 years. A majority, 521 (84.0%), identified as followers of Orthodox Christianity, and most, 575 (92.7%), reported participating in religious practices. More than half, 397 (64.0%), came from urban backgrounds, while 258 (41.6%) lived with both parents. Regarding marital status, 541 (87.3%) were single, and a significant proportion, 423 (68.2%), reported experiencing financial difficulties (Table 1).
Academic characteristics of private college nursing students
With respect to academic performance, about two-thirds (66.6%) of participants had a cumulative grade point average (CGPA) of ≥3.00. The distribution of students by year of study was as follows: first year, 23.9%; second year, 30.0%; third year, 32.9%; and fourth year, 13.2%. The majority, 484 (78.1%), reported having good job prospects (Table 2).
Behavioral characteristics of participants
Out of the total study participants, more than two-thirds, 427 (68.9%), reported drinking alcohol at least once in their lives, while 374 (60.3%) reported drinking within the past 3 months. Other forms of substance use were reported by fewer than 5% of participants. Regarding physical exercise, only 59 (9.5%) students reported engaging in regular activity (Table 3).
Psychosocial and clinical characteristics of participants
Fewer than one-quarter, 115 (18.6%), had ever used guidance and counseling services in their colleges, and 448 (72.3%) reported that the service was not accessible. Only 38 (6.1%) participants reported a history of chronic illness, and 64 (10.3%) reported a family history of mental illness. Regarding social support, nearly half (48.4%) of the students had moderate support (Table 4).
Prevalence of mental distress
The prevalence of mental distress among private college nursing students was 52.7% (95% CI: 48.8%–56.7%). The prevalence among males was 44.4%, compared with 60.7% among females. Thus, a relatively higher prevalence of mental distress was observed in female students.
Factors associated with mental distress
Variables including sex, living condition, religion, religious practices, residency, social support, job prospects, CGPA, chronic illness, family history of mental illness, regular physical exercise, guidance and counseling service use, alcohol ever use, and current alcohol use were associated with mental distress at p <0.20 in the bivariable analysis and were entered into the multivariable regression model.
In the multivariable analysis, the following factors were significantly associated with mental distress: female sex (AOR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.50–3.16), rural residence (AOR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.30–2.95), poor social support (AOR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.20–3.42), not participating in regular physical exercise (AOR = 3.28, 95% CI: 1.68–6.37), never attending guidance and counseling services (AOR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.12–4.99), and family history of mental illness (AOR = 2.65, 95% CI: 1.31–5.35) were found to be associated factors for mental distress with p-value < 0.05 in multivariable logistic analysis (Table 5).
Discussion
Prevalence of mental distress
The overall prevalence of mental distress among private college nursing students was consistent with studies in Ethiopia (Samara) (53.2%) (16) and India (52%) (6). On the contrary, this study (52.7%) was higher than in previous studies conducted in Ethiopia (Gondar (40.9%) (19), Wollo (19.3%) (15), Hawassa (22.30%) (21), Mizan-Aman (29.2%) (18) and Jima (19.7%) (43)). This difference might be because only nursing students were included in this study, whereas previous studies included students from different fields. Profession-specific pressures on nursing students—such as fear of acquiring disease, feelings of inadequacy when confronting certain conditions, and sharing patients’ pain during clinical practicum—could increase the magnitude of mental distress (44, 45). In addition, it may also be that students in private colleges do not have the same protection as public university students and Gondar is also found near to war-affected areas. Furthermore, differences in assessment tools may explain the variation: many earlier studies used the SRQ-20, while this study used the Kessler-10, which considers both mild and moderate levels of distress as “distressed,” potentially inflating prevalence.
The prevalence in this study was also higher compared with studies in Somaliland (Hargeisa) (19.8%) (27), Egypt (17.1%) (24), Tanzania (13.9%) (46), Nigeria (29.6%) (8), India (34.8%) (31). This variation could be related to sex distribution: previous studies reported male predominance, while in the current study more than half of the participants were females (27). Sample size variation may also account for the differences.
However, the prevalence in the current study was lower when compared with studies in Jordan (65.7%) (47), France (75%) (48), Brazil (81.4%) (49) and China (90.86%) (10). This discrepancy may be explained by time variation, as most of those studies were conducted during the active expansion of the COVID-19 pandemic, when lockdowns may have increased mental distress (50, 51). In addition to this, instrumental variation (GHQ was applied to assess mental distress) and also, sample size variation would have contributed to this discrepancy, or it could be a real difference.
Factors associated with mental distress
Gender
In this study, sex was significantly associated with mental distress. Female students were more than twice as likely to develop mental distress compared with male students (AOR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.50–3.16). This finding is consistent with studies from Ethiopia (Debre-Birhan (52), Jimma (43), Hawassa (21), and Mizan-Aman (18), Egypt (24), Jordan (47), and China (10), which also showed higher levels of mental distress among female students. The possible reasons for these sex differences could be; biological variations, such as menstruation-related hormonal changes, as well as additional stressors such as household responsibilities and emotional pressures, which may contribute to higher rates of distress among female students compared with their male counterparts (18, 53, 54).
Residency
Regarding their residency, students who come from rural areas had nearly twice the odds of developing mental distress compared with town dwellers (AOR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.30–2.95). This finding is supported by other studies (55, 56). Entering college requires adjustment at various levels, and rural students may need to cope with unfamiliar environments that are very different from their backgrounds. These challenges could provoke mental distress (57).
Counseling service and social support level
Students who did not attend guidance and counseling services were more than twice as likely to develop mental distress compared with those who did (AOR = 2.36, 95% CI: 1.12–4.99). This was consistent with findings from Tanzania (58) and Britain (59), which reported significant reductions in mental distress among students who used guidance and counseling services. This may be because counseling enables students to perceive reality more accurately and accept it.
In addition, this study also indicated that social support was a significant factor in mental distress. Students with poor social support were about twice as likely to experience mental distress compared with those with strong social support (AOR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.20–3.42). This finding is consistent with studies from Ethiopia (19, 20), Tanzania (46), Ecuador (60), and Spain (61). Social support may promote health by buffering the adverse physiological effects of stress and providing a sense of belonging through communication (62).
Physical exercise
In this study, students who did not perform regular physical exercise were more than three times as likely to develop mental distress compared with those who exercised regularly (AOR = 3.28, 95% CI: 1.68–6.37). This close association may be explained by several biological mechanisms. Exercise may increase diversity in the gut microbiome, including genera within the phylum Firmicutes (63), and positively modulate the gut–brain axis through normal neurotransmitter production, including higher cerebral serotonin levels (64), and through neurogenesis (65, 66). Furthermore, exercise has been shown to enhance endorphin release, which decreases pain and may alleviate mental distress (63, 67, 68).
Family history of mental illness
Students who reported a family history of mental illness were more than twice as likely to experience mental distress compared with those who did not (AOR = 2.64, 95% CI: 1.31–5.35). Similar findings have been reported in other areas of Ethiopia—Gondar (19), Wollo (15), Axum (20), and Adama (69)—as well as in Egypt (24), showing that family history of mental illness is significantly associated with students’ mental distress. This may be explained by genetic factors, poor community perceptions of mental illness, treatment costs, and the limited availability of mental health services in the country (70).
Limitations
This study has some limitations. Initially, the cross-sectional nature of the study design does not provide or confirm an actual cause-and-effect relationship. Furthermore, the data were collected by a self-administrative instrument and some of the variables (such as substance use and family history of mental illness) had required recall of history which might be prone to recall bias.
Conclusion and recommendations
The overall prevalence of mental distress in this study was notably high, which means that more than half of the students were affected. Significant associated factors included female sex, rural residence, poor social support, lack of regular physical exercise, non-use of guidance and counseling services, and family history of mental illness. We recommend that the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Education prioritize mental distress among students by developing and implementing remedial interventions. Colleges should enhance their guidance and counseling services by employing specialized counselors familiar with the stressors faced by healthcare students. Additionally, we recommend promoting regular physical exercise through on-campus fitness programs.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Black DW Grant JE . DSM-5® guidebook: the essential companion to the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Pub: USA (2014).
- 2Organization WH . World health statistics 2016: monitoring health for the SD Gs sustainable development goals. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland (2016).
- 3Cleary M Walter G Jackson D . Not always smooth sailing”: mental health issues associated with the transition from high school to college. Issues Ment Health nursing. (2011) 32:250–4. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2010.548906, PMID: 21355760 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Mofatteh M . Risk factors associated with stress, anxiety, and depression among university undergraduate students. AIMS Public Health. (2021) 8:36. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021004, PMID: 33575406 PMC 7870388 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Hakami RM . Prevalence of psychological distress among undergraduate students at Jazan University: A cross-sectional study. Saudi J Med Med Sci. (2018) 6:82. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_73_17, PMID: 30787826 PMC 6196707 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Kawa MH Shafi H . Evaluation of internet addiction and psychological distress among university students. Int J Modern Soc Sci. (2015) 4:29–41.
- 7James BO Thomas IF Omoaregba JO Okog Benin EO Okonoda KM Ibrahim AW . Psychosocial correlates of perceived stress among undergraduate medical students in Nigeria. Int J Med education. (2017) 8:382. doi: 10.5116/ijme.59c 6.3075, PMID: 29083991 PMC 5694700 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Uwadiae E Osasona S . Psychological distress amongst undergraduate students of a Nigerian University. Cent Afr J Med. (2016) 62:42–8.
