Considerations in planning a controlled human infection model in at-risk groups in sub-Saharan Africa: the case for pneumococcal challenge in people living with HIV in Malawi and a report of stakeholder consultation
Klara Doherty, A Chirwa, Shalom Songolo, Alice Kusakala, E Nsomba, Pemphero Liwonde, Daniela Ferreira, Henry Mwandumba, K Jambo, S Gordon, Andrew Gorringe, Diane Gbesemete, Stephen Lockhart, Paul Kaye, Klara Doherty, Emmanuella Driciru, Klara Doherty, James D Kellner

TL;DR
This paper discusses the ethical and practical considerations of using controlled human infection models in high-risk populations like people living with HIV in Malawi.
Contribution
The paper proposes a framework for safely conducting pneumococcal challenge studies in people living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa.
Findings
Most CHIMs focus on healthy young adults, who differ from high-risk populations like those with HIV.
A pneumococcal carriage model in people living with HIV in Malawi is proposed as a case example.
Safety, ethics, and stakeholder consultation are emphasized for CHIMs in vulnerable populations.
Abstract
Controlled human infection models offer a unique opportunity to understand infectious disease pathogenesis and have accelerated vaccine development and evaluations in malaria and typhoid. One major limitation of most CHIMs is that they are typically conducted in healthy young adults who are generally the population least affected by infectious disease, and who exhibit distinct disease profiles to more at-risk populations such as people living with HIV, young children, and older adults. However, the added value of studying these populations with high relevance is only desirable if it can be done safely, robustly and acceptably. We present a framework to guide the conduct of a controlled human infection model in people living with HIV using a case-example of an experimental human pneumococcal carriage model in a setting of high disease-burden and transmission. Controlled human infection…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPneumonia and Respiratory Infections · Respiratory viral infections research · Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
