Federalism, Science, and State Regulation of Reproduction
Lindsay F. Wiley

TL;DR
The end of federal abortion protections highlights how federalism affects reproductive regulation and the role of science in these debates.
Contribution
The paper explores how federalism reshapes the influence of scientific evidence in state-level reproductive regulation.
Findings
Scientific evidence is less central in determining which level of government regulates reproduction.
Federalism now plays a key role in shaping reproductive justice and research priorities.
The shift impacts health and social science research agendas.
Abstract
In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision ending federal constitutional protection for abortion, interstate and federal-state conflicts are revealing the importance of federalism to reproductive justice. This shift has implications for health and social science research agendas because scientific evidence plays a less significant role in disputes over which government actor is empowered to regulate reproduction than it does in conflicts over reproductive rights.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsReproductive Health and Technologies · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
