Legal Strategies Countering Federal Public Health Data Purges
James G. Hodge
TL;DR
This paper discusses legal efforts to prevent the removal of public health data under federal policies.
Contribution
The paper introduces legal strategies framed within statutory or constitutional limits to counter data purges.
Findings
Federal agencies are removing public health data aligned with Trump administration directives.
Legal claims are being used to stop these data purges and ensure access to essential health information.
Abstract
Ongoing efforts among federal agencies to expunge public health data from websites and other media in line with Trump administration directives on “gender ideology” and other themes has led to widespread confusion, angst, and concern among health officials, medical practitioners, and patients. It has also generated legal claims seeking to reverse and stop public health data purges. Framed within statutory or constitutional limits, legal strategies countering these data policies help assure access to core public health information essential to specific services, care, and outcomes.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Public Health Policies and Education