# Vertebral vascular canal dysplasia in cats: signalment, CT and MRI characteristics, and prevalence

## TL;DR

This study reports that 26.6% of cats have vertebral vascular canal dysplasia (VVCD), a spinal condition previously described in dogs, and evaluates its characteristics using CT and MRI.

## Contribution

The study applies a canine VVCD scoring system to cats and reports the prevalence and imaging characteristics of VVCD in feline populations.

## Key findings

- 26.6% of 2,037 evaluated cats had vertebral vascular canal dysplasia (VVCD).
- CT was found to be superior to MRI for evaluating VVCD due to better anatomical visualization.
- Intra- and interobserver agreement varied, indicating some subjectivity in VVCD scoring.

## Abstract

Numerous vertebral anomalies have been characterised in dogs, whereas congenital vertebral malformations in cats have been less frequently described. The aim of the present study was to report and describe a vertebral malformation in cats recently reported in dogs—vertebral vascular canal dysplasia (VVCD)—to apply the previously reported scoring system to a feline study population, and to evaluate its inter- and intra-observer agreement.

CT and MRI studies from five different feline populations were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were included as VVCD-affected if they showed single or multiple VVCDs of the thoracic vertebral column and were scored using the previously published canine scoring system.

A total of 2,037 cats were evaluated, of which 541 (26.6%) were found to have VVCD. In addition to the thoracic vertebrae, cervical and lumbar vertebrae were also affected. Different score distributions were observed across thoracic vertebrae, suggesting a possible regional pattern. Most patients underwent CT (508), while only 33 had MRI.

CT was considered superior due to its higher spatial resolution and the availability of axial/transverse images for all vertebral bodies, which allowed improved visualisation of vertebral body anatomy and better evaluation of the form, shape, and depth of the dysplastic vascular canals. Especially in more subtle cases, transverse views were necessary to confirm the presence and assess the extent of VVCD. Intra- and interobserver agreement was variable (range 0.543-1.000 and 0.225-0.894, respectively) depending on adjustments to the scoring system, reflecting the role of subjectivity in the interpretation of VVCD with this system. Clinical relevance was not assessed. Future studies are required to investigate prevalence, explore possible etiologies, and determine the potential clinical significance of VVCD in feline spinal disease.