Efficacy of functional electrical stimulation alone and as an adjunct to exercise for improving respiratory function and aerobic capacity in spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Jiahao Xiangli, Binquan Ma, Yu Liang, Shi Haijiangshi, Xifang Liu

TL;DR
This study reviews how functional electrical stimulation (FES) can help improve breathing and aerobic fitness in people with spinal cord injuries, either alone or combined with exercise.
Contribution
The study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis of FES efficacy for respiratory and aerobic outcomes in spinal cord injury patients.
Findings
FES alone significantly improved expiratory function, including PEF, MEP, and FVC.
FES combined with exercise significantly enhanced aerobic capacity, as shown by increased VO₂peak.
No significant improvement was found for MIP or peak ventilation.
Abstract
To systematically evaluate the efficacy of functional electrical stimulation (FES), used either alone or as an adjunct to exercise (rowing/cycling), for improving respiratory function and aerobic capacity in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). We conducted a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis, searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through January 2025. We included 23 randomized controlled trials and self-controlled studies (N = 314) that assessed outcomes such as forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal expiratory/inspiratory pressure (MEP/MIP), and peak oxygen uptake (VO₂peak). When used as a standalone intervention, FES significantly improved expiratory function, with notable increases in PEF (SMD = 0.42, p = 0.007), MEP (SMD=0.93, p = 0.008), and FVC (SMD = 0.37, p = 0.03). However, no significant improvement was found for MIP (p =…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpinal Cord Injury Research · Muscle activation and electromyography studies · Traumatic Brain Injury Research
