# Eco-friendly pomegranate production: Balancing energy consumption and environmental impact

**Authors:** Amir Azizpanah, Mohammad Salavrzi Zadeh, Alaa Kamil Abed, Morteza Taki

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329204 · PLOS One · 2025-08-13

## TL;DR

This study optimizes energy use and reduces environmental impact in pomegranate farming in Iran using data analysis and life cycle assessment.

## Contribution

The study introduces a combined DEA and LCA approach to optimize energy and reduce environmental impact in pomegranate production.

## Key findings

- Optimized practices reduced global warming potential from 40.563 kg CO₂ eq to 35.975 kg CO₂ eq per ton of pomegranate.
- 66.68% of orchards operated at 100% technical efficiency, with an average of 98.96% across all units.
- Energy productivity was 1.12 kgMJ-1, indicating relatively efficient energy use compared to similar crops.

## Abstract

Pomegranate production in Siab (Lorestan), Iran, faces significant challenges related to high energy consumption and environmental degradation, particularly due to inefficient use of agricultural inputs such as fertilizers, water and machinery. These inefficiencies contribute to increased greenhouse gas emissions and higher production costs, making optimization efforts essential for sustainable development. This study investigated the optimization of energy consumption and the reduction of environmental impacts in pomegranate production using a combination of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Data were collected through interviews with farmers and agricultural experts in the region, supported by structured questionnaires. The research evaluated several energy indicators, including an energy ratio of 2.14, which indicates that every unit of energy input yields more than double in output—comparable to other fruit crops like apple or citrus, which typically range between 1.5 and 3.0. Energy productivity was found to be 1.12 kgMJ-1, meaning 1.12 kilograms of pomegranate are produced per megajoule of energy consumed, while specific energy was calculated at 0.89 MJkg ⁻ ¹, showing relatively efficient energy use compared to similar horticultural crops. Net energy gain was 17,142.33 MJha ⁻ ¹, with total energy consumption at 15,211.04 MJha ⁻ ¹ and an energy output of 32,353.38 MJha ⁻ ¹. Economic analysis revealed a gross value of 9,081.64 USDha ⁻ ¹, fixed costs of 204.44 USDha ⁻ ¹, and gross revenue of 8,059.42 USDha ⁻ ¹, resulting in a benefit-to-cost ratio of 0.83. LCA results showed that optimized practices significantly reduced environmental impacts across most of the 15 intermediate environmental indicators analyzed. For instance, global warming potential was reduced from 40.563 kg CO₂ eq per ton of pomegranate under conventional methods to 35.975 kg CO₂ eq with optimized practices. DEA under the Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) model revealed that 66.68% of the surveyed orchards operated at 100% technical efficiency. The average technical efficiency across all units was estimated at 98.96%. The remaining 33.32% of orchards were identified as technically inefficient. Scale efficiency averaged at 99.39%, suggesting that most farms operate near optimal size.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** CML (MESH:D015464), Toxicity (MESH:D064420), carcinogenic (MESH:D011230)
- **Chemicals:** Ozone (MESH:D010126), CFC-11 (MESH:C005848), water (MESH:D014867), urea (MESH:D014508), TEG (MESH:C000619859), potassium (MESH:D011188), P (MESH:D010758), phosphate (MESH:D010710), DMU (-), N (MESH:D009584), CO2 (MESH:D002245)
- **Species:** Malus domestica (apple, species) [taxon 3750], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Helianthus annuus (common sunflower, species) [taxon 4232], Vigna radiata (mung bean, species) [taxon 157791], Punica granatum (granado, species) [taxon 22663], Meleagris gallopavo (common turkey, species) [taxon 9103], Cucumis sativus (cucumber, species) [taxon 3659], Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris (field beet, subspecies) [taxon 3555]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12349013/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12349013/full.md

## References

54 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12349013/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12349013