# Mucous Fistula Refeeding in Newborns: Why, When, How, and Where? Insights from a Systematic Review

## TL;DR

This review shows that refeeding through a mucous fistula in newborns can improve weight gain and reduce the need for intravenous nutrition, but practices vary and need standardization.

## Contribution

The study provides a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness and safety of mucous fistula refeeding in newborns.

## Key findings

- MFR improved weight gain by 24.2 g/day compared to 4.7 g/day in non-MFR groups.
- MFR reduced parenteral nutrition duration by 35 days and shortened hospital and NICU stays.
- MFR lowered cholestasis risk but had inconsistent effects on bilirubin levels and some complications like sepsis.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Infants with high-output enterostomies often require prolonged parenteral nutrition (PN), increasing risks of infections, liver dysfunction, and impaired growth. Mucous fistula refeeding (MFR) is proposed to enhance intestinal adaptation, weight gain, and distal bowel maturation. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed its effectiveness, safety, and technical aspects. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, studies reporting MFR-related outcomes were included without data or language restrictions. Data sources included PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and UpToDate. Bias risk was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. Meta-analysis employed random- and fixed-effects models, with outcomes reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Primary outcomes assessed were weight gain, PN duration, and complications and statistical comparisons were made between MFR and non-MFR groups. Results: Seventeen studies involving 631 infants were included; 482 received MFR and 149 did not. MFR started at 31 postoperative days and lasted for 50 days on average, using varied reinfusion methods, catheter types, and fixation strategies. MFR significantly improved weight gain (4.7 vs. 24.2 g/day, p < 0.05) and reduced PN duration (60.3 vs. 95 days, p < 0.05). Hospital and NICU stays were also shorter (160 vs. 263 days, p < 0.05; 122 vs. 200 days, p < 0.05). Cholestasis risk was lower (OR 0.151, 95% CI 0.071–0.319, p < 0.0001), while effects on bilirubin levels were inconsistent. Complications included sepsis (3.5%), intestinal perforation (0.83%), hemorrhage (0.62%), with one MFR-related death (0.22%). Conclusions: Despite MFR benefits neonatal care, its practices remain heterogeneous. Standardized protocols are required to ensure MFR safety and efficacy.