Neural Correlates Underlying General and Food-Related Working Memory in Females with Overweight/Obesity
Yazhi Pang, Yuanluo Jing, Jia Zhao, Xiaolin Liu, Wen Zhao, Yong Liu, Hong Chen

TL;DR
This study explores how overweight and obese females process general and food-related working memory tasks, finding neural differences linked to cognitive effort and food cue responses.
Contribution
The study reveals distinct neural correlates in overweight/obese individuals during general and food-specific working memory tasks, highlighting cognitive control and reward salience interactions.
Findings
Overweight/obese participants showed poorer general working memory performance and reduced theta power during non-target trials.
Overweight/obese individuals exhibited heightened P2 and LPC amplitudes in response to high-calorie food stimuli.
Lower alpha power in overweight/obese participants during high-calorie non-target trials suggests increased cognitive effort.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Prior research suggest that poor working memory significantly contributes to the growth of overweight and obesity. This study investigated the behavioral and neural aspects of general and food-specific working memory in females with overweight or obesity (OW/OB). Method: A total of 54 female participants, with 26 in the OW/OB group and 28 in the normal-weight (NW) group, completed a general and a food-related two-back task while an EEG was recorded. Results: In the general task, the OW/OB group showed significantly poorer performance (higher IES) than the NW group (p = 0.018, η2 = 0.10), with reduced theta power during non-target trials (p = 0.040, η2 = 0.08). No group differences were found for P2, N2, or P3 amplitudes. In the food-related task, significant group × stimulus interactions were observed. The OW/OB group showed significantly higher P2 amplitudes in…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Cognitive Abilities and Testing
