Comparison of Paramedian Versus Midline Extraction Sites in Elective Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Postoperative Ventral Hernia Development
Fahim Kanani, Naheel Mahajna, Wasim Shaqqur, Anastasiia Iserlis, Chaled Alnakib, Mordechai Shimonov, Amir Nutman, Alaa Zahalka, Nir Messer, Arkadiy Iskhakov, Moshe Kamar, Katia Dayan

TL;DR
Using a paramedian extraction site during laparoscopic right colectomy reduces the risk of postoperative ventral hernias compared to midline sites.
Contribution
This study provides evidence that paramedian extraction sites lower hernia risk and identifies modifiable risk factors like chronic cough and constipation.
Findings
Paramedian extraction sites had a 2.3% POVH rate versus 11.3% for midline sites.
Midline extraction was a strong independent predictor of POVH (aOR 30.3).
Chronic cough and constipation were also significant predictors of POVH.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative ventral hernia (POVH) remains a significant complication following laparoscopic colectomy despite minimally invasive approaches. Extraction site selection may influence POVH incidence, yet optimal location remains controversial. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 550 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic right colectomy (2009–2024) at a single center. After exclusions for anastomotic leak and loss to follow-up, 266 patients were propensity-matched 1:1 comparing paramedian (n = 133) versus midline (n = 133) extraction sites. The primary outcome was POVH incidence at 36 months. Secondary outcomes included risk factor identification using multivariate logistic regression and Firth penalized methods. Results: POVH occurred in 3/133 (2.3%) paramedian versus 15/133 (11.3%) midline patients (p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis identified midline…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHernia repair and management · Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries · Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions
