# Pulse Steroid Therapy for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

**Authors:** Yasumasa Kawano, Junichi Maruyama, Mitsuaki Nishikimi, Hisatomi Arima, Yuhei Irie, Shinichi Morimoto, Kentaro Muranishi, Maiko Nakashio, Yoshihiko Nakamura

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm14155547 · 2025-08-06

## TL;DR

This study found that high-dose steroid therapy did not improve survival or recovery in severe ARDS patients on ECMO.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the efficacy of pulse steroid therapy in severe ARDS patients on V-V ECMO using propensity score-matched analysis.

## Key findings

- Pulse steroid therapy showed no significant improvement in hospital mortality compared to non-pulse steroid therapy.
- ECMO-free days were not significantly different between the pulse and non-pulse steroid groups.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: Low-dose corticosteroids have gained popularity in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, the efficacy of high-dose corticosteroids as pulse steroid therapy remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of pulse steroid therapy in patients with severe ARDS requiring venovenous (V-V) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), where enhanced anti-inflammatory effects may be beneficial. Methods: Using data from the J-CARVE registry, which included patients with severe ARDS managed with V-V ECMO across 24 Japanese hospitals between January 2012 and December 2022, we identified 373 patients treated with corticosteroids. The patients were divided into two groups: pulse steroid therapy and non-pulse steroid therapy. Propensity score matching was performed, and all-cause hospital mortality and ECMO-free days within 28 days were compared between groups. Pulse steroid therapy was defined as methylprednisolone at a dose of 1000 mg/day. Results: After matching, 48 patients were included in each group. The all-cause hospital mortality rates were 41.7% (20/48) in the pulse steroid group and 47.9% (23/48) in the non-pulse steroid group, with no significant difference (odds ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval: 0.53–3.12, p = 0.68). The median ECMO-free days were 9.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0–17.3) in the pulse steroid group and 3 (IQR: 0–17) in the non-pulse steroid group, showing no significant difference (p = 0.69). Conclusions: Pulse steroid therapy did not improve all-cause hospital mortality or ECMO-free days in patients with severe ARDS who required V-V ECMO.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** methylprednisolone (PubChem CID 6741)
- **Diseases:** acute respiratory distress syndrome (MONDO:0006502), ARDS (MONDO:0006502)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** ARDS (MESH:D012128), inflammatory (MESH:D007249), Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (MESH:D045169)
- **Chemicals:** methylprednisolone (MESH:D008775), Steroid (MESH:D013256)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12347770/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12347770