A Promising Prognostic Indicator for Pleural Mesothelioma: Pan-Immuno-Inflammation Value

TL;DR

This study shows that a new blood-based biomarker called PIV can predict survival outcomes in pleural mesothelioma patients more effectively than other markers.

Contribution

PIV is introduced as a novel, easily calculable, and cost-effective prognostic indicator for pleural mesothelioma.

Findings

High PIV values were linked to significantly shorter overall survival in pleural mesothelioma patients.

Low PIV, NLR, and SII values were associated with earlier-stage diagnosis and better eligibility for surgery.

PIV outperformed other blood-based markers in predicting survival and treatment response.

Abstract

Background: Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is a type of cancer that is difficult to diagnose and treat. Patients may have vastly varying prognoses, and prognostic factors may help guide the clinical approach. As a recently identified biomarker, the pan-Immune-Inflammation-Value (PIV) is a simple, comprehensive, and peripheral blood cell-based biomarker. Methods: The present study represents a retrospective observational analysis carried out within a single-center setting. Ninety-five patients with PM stages I–IV were enrolled in the study. We analyzed the correlation between patients’ demographic characteristics, clinicopathological factors such as histological subtypes, surgery status, tumor thickness, blood-based parameters, and treatment options with their prognoses. PIV was calculated by the following formula: (neutrophil count × monocyte count × platelet count)/lymphocyte count. Additionally, blood-based parameters were used to calculate the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and systemic immune inflammation index (SII). Results: We categorized the patients into two groups, low PIV group (PIV ≤ 732.3) and high PIV group (PIV > 732.3) according to the determined cut-off value, which was defined as the median. It was revealed that high PIV was associated with poor survival outcomes. The median follow-up period was 15.8 months (interquartile range, IQR, 7.1 to 29.8 months). The median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in patients in the low PIV group (median 29.8 months, 95% confidence interval (CI), 15.6 to 44) than the high PIV group (median 14.7 months, 95% CI, 10.8 to 18.6 p < 0.001). Furthermore, the study revealed that patients with low PIV, NLR, and SII values were more likely to be eligible for surgery and were diagnosed at earlier stages. Additionally, these markers were identified as potential predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) in the surgical cohort and of treatment response across the entire patient population. Conclusions: In addition to well-established clinical factors such as stage, histologic subtype, resectability, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), PIV emerged as an independent and significant prognostic factor of overall survival (OS) in patients with PM. Moreover, PIV also demonstrated a remarkable independent prognostic value for disease-free survival (DFS) in this patient population. Additionally, some clues are provided for conditions such as treatment responses, staging, and suitability for surgery. As such, in this cohort, it has outperformed the other blood-based markers based on our findings. Given its ease of calculation and cost-effectiveness, PIV represents a promising and practical prognostic tool in the clinical management of pleural mesothelioma. It can be easily calculated using routinely available laboratory parameters for every cancer patient, requiring no additional cost or complex procedures, thus facilitating its integration into everyday clinical practice.

Figures