Porcine Lymphotropic Herpesvirus (PLHV) Was Not Transmitted During Transplantation of Genetically Modified Pig Hearts into Baboons

TL;DR

A study found that a type of herpesvirus common in pigs did not spread to baboons after receiving pig heart transplants.

Contribution

The study demonstrates that PLHV is not transmissible to nonhuman primates during xenotransplantation.

Findings

PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3 were detected in nearly all donor pigs.

No evidence of PLHV transmission to baboon recipients was observed.

Abstract

Porcine lymphotropic herpesviruses -1, -2, and -3 (PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3) are gammaherpesviruses that are widespread in pigs. These viruses are closely related to the human pathogens Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), both of which are known to cause severe diseases in humans. To date, however, no definitive association has been established between PLHVs and any disease in pigs. With the growing interest in xenotransplantation as a means to address the shortage of human organs for transplantation, the safety of using pig-derived cells, tissues, and organs is under intense investigation. In preclinical trials involving pig-to-nonhuman primate xenotransplantation, another porcine herpesvirus—porcine cytomegalovirus, a porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV)—was shown to be transmissible and significantly reduced the survival time of the xenotransplants. In the present study, we examined donor pigs and their respective baboon recipients, all of which were part of preclinical pig heart xenotransplantation studies, for the presence of PLHV. PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3 were detected in nearly all donor pigs; however, no evidence of PLHV transmission to the baboon recipients was observed.

Full text

1. Introduction

Xenotransplantation using cells or organs from genetically modified pigs is progressing toward clinical application. Following numerous successful preclinical trials involving the transplantation of pig organs into non-human primates, the first transplantations of pig hearts and kidneys into human patients have been performed [1]. In addition to challenges such as immune rejection and physiological incompatibility, the risk of transmitting porcine microorganisms remains a significant hurdle [2]. The transmission of porcine cytomegalovirus, a porcine roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV), to the first human recipient of a pig heart [3] highlighted the need for highly sensitive methods to detect porcine viruses in donor pigs and effective strategies to prevent such transmissions.

Porcine lymphotropic herpesviruses -1, -2, and -3 (PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3), also called suid gammaherpesviruses 3, 4, and 5 (SuHV-3, SuHV-4, and SuHV-5), are viral species of the Macavirus genus, Gammaherpesvirinae subfamily, within the Herpesviridae family. SuHV-3/PLHV-1 and SuHV-4/PLHV-2 were first reported by Ehlers et al. in 1999 [4]. Later, another suid gammaherpesvirus was found with considerable genomic differences relative to PLHV-1 and PLHV-2 and named suid gammaherpesvirus 5 (porcine lymphotropic herpesvirus 3—PLHV-3) [5]. For the sake of simplicity, we will stick to the designations PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3.

Under natural conditions there were no reports that PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3 represent primary pathogens of pigs or co-factors in other viral infections [6]. Despite their high prevalence, PLHVs’ relevance for the pig industry appears low. Their transmission occurs mainly horizontally, but vertical transmission is possible [7,8].

PLHV-1 has been associated with a form of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in immunosuppressed pigs undergoing experimental allogenic bone marrow transplantations [9,10,11]. The clinical symptoms of experimental porcine PTLD, such as fever, lethargy, anorexia, high white blood cell count, and palpable lymph nodes, are similar to those of human PTLD, a serious complication of solid human organ and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation linked to Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) (human herpesvirus-4, HHV-4) [11].

In studies published to date analyzing the prevalence of PLHV [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26] (Table 1), both PCR-based methods and immunological assays have been employed. The publications were selected based on their screening for PLHV or reporting on PLHV prevalence. The PCR approaches used primers and probes targeting sequences of the DNA polymerase and glycoprotein B genes. Immunological methods, including Western blot and ELISA, were used to detect antibodies against PLHV as indirect indicators of infection. For example, ELISA-based testing revealed seropositivity rates ranging from 38% in piglets to 90% in gilts and 100% in breeding sows and pigs intended for slaughter [27]. The presence of high antibody titers in newborn piglets, which decline over time, indicates the transfer of virus-specific antibodies via colostrum from infected mother sows [27]. This pattern has also been observed in cases involving PCMV/PRV [28].

PLHVs are closely related to alcelaphine herpesvirus type 1, AlHV-1, and ovine herpesvirus type 2, OvHV-2, two gammaherpesviruses, which are apathogenic in their natural hosts but cause serious lymphoproliferative diseases in other species [29]. Accordingly, PLHV may be apathogenic in pigs but pathogenic in other species, including humans. Here, we demonstrate that although PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3 were present in the donor pigs, they were not transmitted to the baboon recipient of the pig heart.

2. Results

2.1. Presence of PLHV in Donor Pigs for Heart Xenotransplantation

Thirteen donor pigs and the corresponding baboon recipients were tested for PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3. The immunosuppressive regimen was based on a co-stimulation blockade targeting the CD40/CD40 L pathway, as previously described in detail [30]. For induction therapy, animals additionally received a B cell–depleting monoclonal antibody and a T cell–directed immunomodulatory agent. Maintenance therapy consisted of continued co-stimulation blockade in combination with an antiproliferative compound and corticosteroids. PCMV/PRV from the donor pig was transmitted to three of the 10 baboons. The presence of the porcine cytomegalovirus, which is actually a roseolovirus (PCMV/PRV) [31] (in some pigs and baboons at very high virus loads) contributed to a short survival time of these transplants [32] (Table 2). Whereas only three donor pigs were PCMV/PRV positive, all pigs were tested positive for PLHV-1 or -2, but none of them were positive for PLHV-3. To test for PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3, two conventional PCR methods, one detecting PLHV-1 and PHLV-2 and the other PHLV-3, were performed. Although PLHV-1 or PHLV-2 were found in all donor pigs, no virus was found in the recipient baboons (Table 2). The following baboon tissues were analyzed: spleen, liver, lung, and kidney. None of these tissues tested positive for PLHV-1 or PLHV-2.

2.2. Real-Time PCR-Based Detection of PLHV in Donor Pigs

To investigate the situation in greater detail, real-time PCR assays were developed and employed to detect PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3. Samples were collected from the liver and spleen of three new donor pigs (7649, 7654, and 7687), as well as from tissues of the corresponding baboon recipients (A, B, and C). These animals had survival times over 150 days, with the exception of baboon B, with only one day. The tissues analyzed included the liver and spleen of the baboons—except for baboon B, for which no tissues were available—and the left and right ventricles of the explanted pig hearts retrieved post-mortem (Table 3). Importantly, one donor pig, animal 7649, tested negative for all three PLHV viruses. This pig was the only one among the 11 animals tested to be completely free of PLHV. In contrast, pig 7654 was positive for PLHV-2 in both the liver and spleen. Pig 7687 was found to be co-infected with PLHV-1 and PLHV-3, with both viruses present in both organs.

None of the PLHV viruses were detected in any of the transplanted baboons or in the explanted pig hearts. This indicates that PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3 were not transmitted to the baboons. Although the presence of PLHV might be expected in the transplanted pig hearts—given the viral detection in the donor liver and spleen—the viral load was probably below the detection threshold of our assay.

The detection limit of the real-time PCR method used was 1 copy per 100 ng of total DNA for all three PLHV targets [18]. PCMV/PRV was not detected in any of the donor pigs, the transplanted baboons, or the explanted pig hearts.

To assess the presence of pig cells in baboon tissues (microchimerism), we performed a Short Interspersed Nuclear Elements (SINE) PCR and detected pig-specific sequences in all baboon tissue samples (Table 3). This indicates that pig cells were present in all analyzed baboon organs. These findings are consistent with previous results obtained using the same SINE PCR assay [34], as well as in a case of transplantation of a PCMV/PRV-positive heart, with immunohistochemical analyses employing a PCMV/PRV-specific antibody [35]. The high load of SINE sequences in the right and left ventricles is not surprising, as the tissue is of pig origin. Surprisingly, the ventricles explanted from baboon A show a particularly low load of SINE sequences—levels even lower than those observed in the baboon’s liver and spleen. This discrepancy suggests that incorrect material may have been submitted for testing.

However, if any of the pig cells present in the baboon tissues were positive for PLHV, their number was likely below the detection threshold of our assay, and thus the viruses could not be detected.

The results clearly indicate that all three PLHV, PHLV-1, PHLV-2, and PHLV-3, were not replicating in the transplanted pig heart and were not infecting baboon cells.

3. Discussion

We demonstrated that although PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3 were present in the donor pigs, these viruses were not transmitted to the non-human primate recipients of the pig hearts. This contrasts sharply with the case of PCMV/PRV, which was consistently transmitted to recipients regardless of the species (baboon or cynomolgus monkey), the transplanted organ (kidney or heart), or the transplantation method (heterotopic or orthotopic) [32,36,37,38]. Although a Western blot assay which we had established at the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin to screen for antibodies against PLHV [13], was not available, it is unlikely that this assay would have produced a different result. PCMV/PRV transmission significantly reduced graft survival. Notably, in orthotopic heart transplantations, survival time dropped from 195 days to fewer than 20 days [32]. PCMV/PRV was identified as the cause of multiorgan failure, altered cytokine profiles, and coagulation abnormalities [32]. The virus was also transmitted to the first human patient who received a pig heart transplant in Baltimore, where it likely contributed to the patient’s death [3,39]. Importantly, PCMV/PRV transmission occurred even when the virus was undetectable in the donor pig by PCR due to its latent state—this was observed both in a baboon case [40] and in the first human xenotransplantation patient [3,39]. Although PCMV/PRV does not infect human or non-human primate cells in vitro and does not affect healthy humans in contact with pigs or consuming undercooked pork, it causes disease specifically in the context of xenotransplantation [41].

When Mueller et al. [21] conducted transplantations of thymokidneys, kidneys, and hearts from Large White/Landrace cross-breed pigs transgenic for human decay-accelerating factor, as well as from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) miniature swine, they found that 78% of the donor pigs were positive for PLHV-1 and 25% for PLHV-2. All donor animals tested positive for PCMV/PRV. In the recipient baboons, the authors observed strong replication of PCMV/PRV in the explanted pig organs. However, no increase in PLHV-1 viral load was detected in xenografts that were PLHV-1–positive. PLHV was primarily localized to lymphoid tissues. Despite immunosuppression and the presence of xenogeneic immune responses, neither PLHV-1–positive xenotransplants nor those negative at baseline showed signs of PLHV-1 activation. The authors suggested that the lack of PLHV replication may be due to the absence of a sufficient number of target cells capable of supporting PLHV-1 replication within solid-organ xenografts.

When Issa et al. [42] transplanted organs from pigs transgenic for human decay-accelerating factor or from alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout miniature pigs into baboons, PLHV-1 DNA was detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of 6 out of 10 transplanted baboons. However, there was no evidence of productive PLHV-1 infection, as viral loads in the serum did not increase over time, even with prolonged transplant survival. The authors concluded that the presence of viral DNA likely resulted from persistent pig cell microchimerism rather than active viral replication. While PCMV/PRV can be effectively eliminated from source animals through early weaning of piglets [43,44], this strategy failed to exclude PLHV-1 [43]. This difference underscores the distinct mechanisms of infection and latency between PCMV/PRV and PLHV-1, two unrelated herpesviruses.

In our first experiment, summarized in Table 2, PLHV-3 was not detected in any of the donor pigs, PLHV-1 was detected in eight and PLHV-2 in two pigs. In contrast, in the second experiment (Table 3), all three PLHV types were detected. Notably, this experiment marked the first time a PLHV-free animal was identified in our facility, as well as the first documented case of co-infection with PLHV-1 and PLHV-3 (Table 3).

Co-infections with two or even all three PLHV types are not uncommon. In a screening of 21 indigenous Greek black pigs, six animals were infected with all three viruses, and the remaining animals were infected with two [18]. Among them, six pigs carried PLHV-1 and PLHV-3, while nine were infected with PLHV-2 and PLHV-3 [18]. In contrast, all 10 German slaughterhouse pigs tested were positive for PLHV-1 and PLHV-3, but not for PLHV-2 [20]—the same combination found in animal 7687 (Table 3).

The absence of PLHV in the explanted pig hearts after prolonged survival times of more than 150 days indicates that the virus present in the donor pig was not replicating in the xenotransplant, even under conditions of immunosuppression and extended survival.

Regarding the genetic relatedness of the three PLHV viruses, PLHV-3 is significantly more distantly related to PLHV-1 and PLHV-2 than PLHV-1 and PLHV-2 are to each other [5].

As mentioned in the introduction, the gene content of porcine lymphotropic herpesviruses (PLHVs) is highly similar to that of alcelaphine herpesvirus 1 (AlHV-1), associated with wildebeests, and ovine herpesvirus 2 (OvHV-2), associated with sheep [5,26,45]. These viruses cause malignant catarrhal fever (MCF), a lymphoproliferative and inflammatory disease that is typically fatal in susceptible species. PLHVs are also related to bovine lymphotropic herpesvirus (BLHV), which is associated with bovine leukemia [46], and caprine herpesvirus 2 (CprHV-2), which has been linked to chronic disease in sika deer [47,48]. While BLHV is believed to contribute to the pathogenesis of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection [46], and CprHV-2 is implicated in chronic illness in cervids [49], AlHV-1 and OvHV-2 are well adapted to their natural hosts—wildebeests and sheep, respectively—and remain apathogenic in those species. However, when transmitted to non-natural hosts such as cattle or deer, they can cause MCF [29]. Therefore, the potential for PLHVs to cause disease in xenotransplantation recipients cannot be excluded.

PLHV-1, -2, and -3 are also related to the human gammaherpesviruses Epstein–Barr Virus (EBV or human herpesvirus 4, HHV-4) and the human Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV, or human herpesvirus 8, HHV-8). Moreover, they are related to EBV and KSHV in terms of B cell tropism, and sequence similarity of conserved genes [4,5,50]. Although PLHV, HHV-4 and HHV-8 belong to the Gammaherpesvirinae subfamily, they fall into different genera within that subfamily. PLHV are macaviruses, HHV-4 is a lymphocryptovirus, and HHV-8 is a rhadinovirus. PLHV-1 is more closely related to the rhadinoviruses (the genus that includes HHV-8) than to lymphocryptoviruses like HHV-4. The sequence homology is limited and mostly confined to conserved core genes (e.g., DNA polymerase, terminase, and capsid proteins).

PLHV-3 was found in the permanent porcine B cell line L23 and two other lymphoma cell lines, 1B2 and 2F8 [5,33]. EBV is associated with a post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) occurring in the setting of iatrogenic immune suppression following hematopoietic or solid organ transplant [51,52]. A similar disorder was observed in PLHV-1-positive minipigs after experimental allogenic bone marrow transplantations [12,13,14]. In the genome of PLHV-1, three genes encoding for putative immediate-early gene (IE) transactivators (ORF50, ORFA6/BZLF1 h, and ORF57) were found which are homologous to transactivators of HHV-8 and EBV [53], demonstrating the relationship of these viruses.

Several herpesviruses contain open reading frames that encode viral G protein-coupled receptors (vGPCRs), which they acquired from the host. BILF1 is the vGPCR encoded by EBV; it is a molecule with immunoevasive properties associated with MHC-I cell surface downregulation [54,55,56], thereby preventing recognition of EBV-infected cells by CD8+ T cells [57]. BILF1 has not only an immunoevasive properties, but also acts as an oncogene [58,59]. The BILF1 orthologues from PLHV1–3 are similar to EBV-BILF1 regarding cell surface localization, constitutive internalization, and ability to downregulate MHC-I [60]. PLHV1-BILF1 was found upregulated in lymphatic tissue from diseased miniature pigs with PTLD [60]. This data suggests that like EBV-BILF1, PLHV1–3-BILFs could have cell-transforming properties.

Given these findings and given that PLHV-1 transactivators are capable of upregulating EBV and HHV-8 promoters [61], it is advisable to use PLHV-free donor pigs for xenotransplantation. However, eliminating PLHV-1 to -3 from donor herds poses significant challenges. Early weaning has proven ineffective [43], there are currently no antiviral treatments or vaccines available, and although cross-placental transmission of PLHV is extremely rare, it remains possible [11]. Nonetheless, as demonstrated in this study, PLHV-negative animals—such as pig 7649—do exist and can be selectively bred for use in xenotransplantation.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals and Tissue Samples

Pigs 5528, 5415, 5420, 5623, 5803, 5807, and 6249, all of which were triple genetically modified, served as heart donors for baboons J, K, L, M, O, N, P, and Q, as previously described [30]. Pigs 6827 and 7094 served as donors for baboons X and Y, respectively (Table 2). Donor pigs were screened using blood samples, while formalin-fixed tissues were used for testing the baboon recipients [32].

Similarly, pigs 7649, 7654, and 7687, which were also triple genetically modified (α1,3-galactosyltransferase-knockout and expressing human CD46 and thrombomodulin), were used as heart donors for baboons A, B, and C. Orthotopic pig-to-baboon cardiac xenotransplantation using continuous non-ischemic preservation and pharmacological growth inhibition was performed as previously described in detail [30]. The immunosuppressive regimen was based on a co-stimulation blockade targeting the CD40/CD40 L pathway, as previously detailed [30]. For induction therapy, animals additionally received a B cell–depleting monoclonal antibody and a T cell–directed immunomodulatory agent. Maintenance therapy consisted of continued co-stimulation blockade in combination with an antiproliferative compound and corticosteroids.

4.2. Blood Collection

Blood sampling from adult sows was performed without sedation under manual fixation. Whole blood was drawn from the jugular vein with single-use needles (Ehrhardt Medizinprodukte, Geislingen, Germany) into lithium heparin and serum Monovettes (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany).

4.3. DNA Isolation

Formalin-fixed tissues from baboons J, K, L, M, O, N, P, and Q were cut into small pieces, and DNA was isolated according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) [32].

DNA was isolated from frozen tissue samples according to the manufacters’ instructions using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). DNA concentrations were determined using a NanoDrop ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Worcester, MA, USA).

4.4. PCR and Real-Time PCR

Pigs and baboons listed in Table 2 were tested using a conventional PCR detecting PLHV-1 and PLHV-2 (PLHV-1 gives a 400 bp band, PLHV-2 gives a 343 bp band) and a conventional PCR detecting PLHV-3 (Table 4) as described [5,32,62]. PCMV/PRV was screened using a real-time PCR [32]. Animals listed in Table 3 were tested using real-time PCRs with specific primers and probes. The sensitivity to detect PCMV/PRV (sensitivity 10 copies/100 ng DNA), PLHV-1 (1 copy/100 ng DNA), PLHV-2 (1 copy/100 ng DNA), and PLHV-3 (1 copy/100 ng DNA) was described previously [18]. The primers and probes are listed in Table 4. All protocols were performed using the SensiFAST Probe No-ROX Kit (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH, USA) in a reaction volume of 16 μL plus 4 μL (100 ng) of DNA template. Duplex real-time PCRs were performed, testing simultaneously the viral gene of interest and porcine/human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase (p/hGAPDH) as an internal control. The functionality of the PCRs was verified using virus-specific gene blocks containing the sequence of the primers and the probe [17]. Real-time PCR reactions were carried out using a qTOWER3 G qPCR cycler (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany) and the real-time PCR conditions as previously described [18].

5. Conclusions

PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3 are widely distributed among pigs, including those bred specifically for xenotransplantation. These viruses can be readily detected using PCR-based methods. Although PLHV-1, PLHV-2, and PLHV-3 have been identified in donor pigs, no transmission to transplanted baboons has been observed to date using PCR-based methods. Nevertheless, it is recommended to use virus-free animals, as some related gammaherpesviruses have been shown to cause severe disease following trans-species transmission.