# Non-Surgical Rhinoplasty After Nasal Skin Cancer Reconstruction: Enhancing Esthetic Outcomes

**Authors:** Shahin Tahan Shoushtari, Charles Savoldelli, Héloïse Gobillot, Laurent Castillo, Gilles Poissonnet, Philippe Kestemont, Grégoire D’Andréa, Clair Vandersteen

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/jcm14155394 · Journal of Clinical Medicine · 2025-07-31

## TL;DR

Non-surgical rhinoplasty using hyaluronic acid may improve the appearance and quality of life for patients after nasal skin cancer surgery.

## Contribution

This study explores non-surgical rhinoplasty as a minimally invasive alternative to repeated surgeries for esthetic improvement after nasal cancer reconstruction.

## Key findings

- Patients showed significant improvement in FACE-Q scores after non-surgical rhinoplasty.
- There was a mean volumetric gain of 1.13 mL at one month and 1.19 mL at two months.
- Results suggest hyaluronic acid-based rhinoplasty could be beneficial for post-reconstructive esthetic concerns.

## Abstract

Objectives: Nasal reconstructive surgery following skin cancer resection is challenging, with esthetic concerns impacting patients’ quality of life. Non-surgical rhinoplasty may be an alternative to repeated surgeries. This study aimed to evaluate non-surgical rhinoplasty esthetic benefits and subjective patient outcomes after skin cancer resection. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on patients with post-operative esthetic dissatisfaction after nasal skin cancer surgery, who underwent non-surgical rhinoplasty with hyaluronic acid. Subjective benefits were evaluated with the FACE-Q Rhinoplasty self-questionnaire at three consultations: before injection (baseline), and at one and two months after. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional Vectra H2 photographs were used to assess subjective esthetic concerns and objective volumetric changes. Results: The study included six female patients with an average age of 58.3 years. They had undergone, on average, five nasal surgeries for cancer. The mean FACE-Q scores were 53.3 (±10.31), 77.5 (±4.18), and 79.7 (±6.76), respectively, at baseline, one month, and two months. Significant differences were observed between baseline and one month (p < 0.001) and between baseline and two months (p < 0.001), but not between one and two months. The was a mean volumetric gain of 1.13 mL at one month and 1.19 mL at two months. Conclusions: This preliminary study suggested that hyaluronic acid-based non-surgical rhinoplasty could improve esthetic outcomes and quality of life in patients who had undergone nasal skin cancer surgery. These findings highlight a potential role for this minimally invasive technique in selected post-reconstructive cases, although the small sample size limited the generalizability of the results and underlined the need for further prospective evaluation.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** skin cancer (MONDO:0002898)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Nasal Skin Cancer (MESH:D012878), cancer (MESH:D009369)
- **Chemicals:** hyaluronic acid (MESH:D006820)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12347352/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12347352/full.md

## References

56 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12347352/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12347352