# Evaluation of Pleth Variability Index in the Lithotomy Position in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

## TL;DR

This study found that the Pleth Variability Index (PVI) is more sensitive in guiding fluid management for elderly patients during prostate surgery in the lithotomy position.

## Contribution

The study evaluates PVI's reliability in geriatric patients in the lithotomy position under spinal anesthesia, a scenario with limited prior data.

## Key findings

- Geriatric patients had significantly higher PVI values in the lithotomy position compared to non-geriatric patients.
- PVI showed age-dependent variability, suggesting its clinical utility in guiding fluid management for elderly patients.
- Intraoperative hypotension rates were stable between the groups, supporting PVI-guided therapy effectiveness.

## Abstract

Background/Objectives: The Pleth Variability Index (PVI) is a non-invasive parameter used to guide fluid management by reflecting respiratory-induced variations in the plethysmographic waveform. While PVI’s reliability in various positions has been studied, data on its behavior in geriatric patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) in the lithotomy position remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the lithotomy position on PVI in geriatric versus non-geriatric patients under spinal anesthesia. Methods: This prospective observational study included 90 patients undergoing elective TUR-P in the lithotomy position under spinal anesthesia. Patients were divided into geriatric (≥65 years, n = 48) and non-geriatric (<65 years, n = 42) groups. PVI and Perfusion Index (PI) were recorded at baseline, in the supine position, and in the lithotomy position. Fluid and vasopressor requirements, along with hemodynamic parameters, were also analyzed. Results: PVI values at the 5th minute in the lithotomy position were significantly higher in the geriatric group compared to the non-geriatric group (p = 0.019). No significant differences were observed in PI values or intraoperative hypotension rates between the groups. Neurological comorbidities were more prevalent in the geriatric group (p = 0.025). Conclusions: PVI appears to be a more sensitive indicator of fluid responsiveness in elderly patients under spinal anesthesia in the lithotomy position. Its age-dependent variability suggests clinical utility in guiding fluid management in geriatric populations, while the stable hypotension rates support the effectiveness of PVI-guided goal-directed therapy.