Spinal manipulation/mobilization: past, present, future
Martin Descarreaux, Jan Hartvigsen, Sidney M. Rubinstein, Stephen M. Perle
TL;DR
This commentary summarizes a series of papers on spinal manipulation/mobilization, covering biomechanics, clinical science, and policy implications.
Contribution
The series provides new insights and recommendations for improving healthcare delivery and outcomes through SMT.
Findings
The papers offer evidence on the biomechanics and clinical science of spinal manipulation/mobilization.
They suggest training and policy changes to enhance healthcare delivery and outcomes.
Research methods and policy implications of SMT are explored in detail.
Abstract
This commentary brings the 2021-2023thematic series Spinal Manipulation/Mobilization: Past, Present, Future to a close. The 23 papers published in the series contribute to our understanding of spinal manipulation/mobilization(SMT) in a few important domains. They provide evidence on the biomechanics, clinical science, research methods, and policy implications of SMT. They present suggested training, research and policy changes that can be made to improve health care delivery and outcomes.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology · Shoulder Injury and Treatment