Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring among patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, autonomic dysfunction, and controls
Megan Bach, Joseph Kassab, Ahmed Mohamed Hassan, Nandan Kodur, Luke J. Laffin

TL;DR
This study compares blood pressure monitoring in patients with autonomic dysfunction and finds varying results depending on the condition.
Contribution
The study reveals that blood pressure monitoring may be less useful for POTS patients compared to others with autonomic dysfunction.
Findings
76% of AD patients without POTS had uncontrolled blood pressure.
Only 19% of POTS patients had uncontrolled blood pressure.
ABPM may provide less value for POTS patients.
Abstract
The utility of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) among patients with various forms of autonomic dysfunction (AD) is unknown. Twenty-four-hour ABPM among patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), AD without POTS, and control patients without AD were compared. Patients with AD without POTS had high rates of uncontrolled blood pressure (76%), whereas 19% of patients with POTS had uncontrolled blood pressure, suggesting ABPM may provide less value among patients with POTS.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders · Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control · Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
