# Seven-Year Results for RESILIA Tissue in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Replacement Patients: Age and Valve Size Considerations

**Authors:** Michael Salna, Joseph E Bavaria, David Heimansohn, Thomas Beaver, Bartley Griffith, Lars G Svensson, Philippe Pibarot, Michael A Borger, Vinod H Thourani, Eugene H Blackstone, Lorraine D Cornwell, John D Puskas, Hiroo Takayama

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf176 · Interdisciplinary Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery · 2025-08-01

## TL;DR

A study found that RESILIA tissue valves provided durable results for younger bicuspid aortic valve patients over seven years without structural deterioration.

## Contribution

The study provides long-term evidence of RESILIA tissue valve durability in younger bicuspid aortic valve patients.

## Key findings

- No structural valve deterioration was observed in bicuspid aortic valve patients over 7 years.
- Survival rates, stroke, and reoperation rates were similar between bicuspid and tricuspid patients.
- Haemodynamic parameters remained stable in bicuspid patients under 65 years old.

## Abstract

Patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease requiring surgical aortic valve replacement are often younger and want to avoid lifelong anticoagulation. A multicentre single-arm non-randomized study, the COMMENCE trial, studied outcomes of RESILIA tissue aortic valves in bicuspid aortic valve patients through 7 years of follow-up.

Of 672 patients who underwent surgical replacement of native aortic valves, 214 had bicuspid and 458 had tricuspid aortic valves. Propensity score analyses with inverse probability of treatment weighting were utilized to minimize bias due to measured confounders. Linear mixed-effect models compared longitudinal changes in haemodynamic parameters.

Patients with bicuspid were significantly younger than those with tricuspid aortic valves—mean age of bicuspid: 59.8 (12.4) vs tricuspid: 70.2 (9.5) years; P < .001; 39/214 (18%) bicuspid aortic valve patients were <50 years old. There was no evidence of structural valve deterioration in any bicuspid aortic valve patients over 7 years of follow-up. At 7 years, there was no significant difference between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve patients in propensity score- and age-adjusted survival (91.9% vs 88.1%, respectively; P = .35), stroke, or reoperation. Among bicuspid aortic valve patients <65 years of age, there was no significant difference in prosthetic valve effective orifice areas and mean gradients between 3 months and 7 years postoperatively.

Patients with bicuspid aortic valves had excellent outcomes with RESILIA tissue valves at 7 years with no evidence of structural valve deterioration. These results suggest a durable alternative for carefully selected younger patients wishing to avoid anticoagulation.

NCT01757665.

Currently, there are approximately 7 million people with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) living in the United States, comprising ∼2% of the population.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** aortic valve disease (MONDO:0003803)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** bicuspid (MESH:D000082882), stroke (MESH:D020521), aortic valve (MESH:D001024)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12342796/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12342796/full.md

## References

26 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12342796/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12342796