# An implementation science framework to understand low coverage in mass dog rabies vaccination

## TL;DR

This study explores why mass dog rabies vaccination campaigns in Arequipa, Peru, have low coverage, using a framework to identify barriers and suggest solutions.

## Contribution

Applies the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify and address barriers to rabies vaccination in a post-pandemic context.

## Key findings

- Barriers include poor communication, decreased rabies risk perception, and financial constraints.
- Stakeholders co-designed solutions like expanding campaign hours and improving interinstitutional collaboration.
- The pandemic shifted priorities away from rabies prevention, impacting vaccination efforts.

## Abstract

Dog-mediated human rabies has been greatly reduced in the Americas and eliminated from most high-income countries. However, many countries in Africa, Asia, and parts of Latin America are still struggling with this gruesome disease. Mass dog vaccination, a One Health strategy, is the primary approach for elimination. However, achieving and sustaining appropriate vaccination coverage in endemic areas remains a challenge. Our objective was to apply the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) in Arequipa, Peru as a guiding tool to understand the barriers faced by different stakeholders.

Seven focus groups with 56 participants were conducted to capture community perspectives on rabies and vaccination. A workshop was conducted with two groups of public health personnel (n = 69): mass dog vaccination campaign (MDVC) implementers and authorities, in charge of dog rabies control. With these stakeholders we explored factors contributing to the decrease in MDVC post COVID-19. We used the CFIR approach to understand barriers within five different domains: innovation, outer setting, inner setting, individuals, and implementation.

Barriers within the community included insufficient communication, a short vaccination period, and fragmented collaboration among health system coordinators. At the individual level, a decreased perception of rabies risk occurred as both people and their dogs spent more time indoors due to the COVID-19 pandemic (in urban areas). Dog vaccination was deprioritized compared to COVID-19 protection, with individuals focusing on their own vaccinations and avoiding crowded spaces. In periurban areas, longer work hours due to the pandemic’s financial impact left less time for dog vaccinations on weekends. Participants reported confusion caused by private veterinarians, who claimed that government-subsidized vaccines were of poor quality. Among implementers and authorities, the main barriers included insufficient MDVC materials and equipment, unclear responsibilities, and a lack of time to evaluate the campaign after activities. Importantly, financial constraints and fragmented commitment from higher-level institutions posed challenges for proper planning and implementation.

We identified barriers and co-designed strategies to improve MDVC participation including strengthening municipal alliances, virtual and physical publicity for events within districts, adequate training for vaccinators, reinforcing vaccinators to remain in fixed spots, and expanding vaccination campaign hours.

Dog-mediated human rabies, a fatal and preventable disease, remains a significant public health challenge in some parts of Latin America, including Arequipa, Peru. Despite efforts to control the disease through mass dog vaccination campaigns (MDVCs), achieving and maintaining adequate vaccination coverage has proven difficult, especially in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. To address this issue, we applied the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), a widely used tool in implementation science, to identify barriers to MDVC implementation and propose actionable solutions. Through focus groups with community members and a workshop with public health personnel, we identified key challenges, including fragmented communication, decreased public perception of rabies risk, financial and logistical constraints, and misinformation about vaccine quality. Our findings reveal that the pandemic not only disrupted vaccination campaigns but also shifted public and institutional priorities away from rabies prevention. By engaging with stakeholders, we co-designed strategies to overcome these barriers, such as improving interinstitutional collaboration, enhancing public awareness, and extending campaign hours to better accommodate the community’s needs. This study underscores the importance of a One Health approach to understand the complexities of controlling a canine rabies outbreak, including integrating perspectives from diverse stakeholders to develop sustainable solutions for rabies control. Our recommendations aim to strengthen rabies elimination efforts in Arequipa and can inform similar strategies in other endemic regions.