Comments on "Accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in evaluation of thyroid nodules using different ultrasonographic and cytological features"
Ilker Sengul, Demet Sengul

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Dear Editor,
Ab initio, disorders and therapeutic options for the delicate papillon gland, the thyroid, have been a dynamic discipline that may demand a gracious approach from human beings in thyroidology^ 1-5 ^. We have read with a great deal the research article of Al-Yousofy et al.^ 6 ^ entitled "Accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in evaluation of thyroid nodules using different ultrasonographic and cytological features." This utilitarian research seems to demand a determination of the efficacy of the ultrasonography (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in 212 cases during 7 years, using cytologic and sonographic features. Al-Yousofy et al.^ 6 ^ declared in their study the significant US features that favor malignancy, such as hypoechogenicity, mixed echogenicity, irregular border, microcalcification, and rim halo. In addition, the authors emphasized a significant difference between different categories of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). Somewhat apart, they laid stress on the cytologic features compliant with malignancy, such as grooving, nuclear irregularities, nuclear pseudoinclusion, and little colloid. Nevertheless, a wide range of needle sizes, 20–27 Gauge (G), have been used for FNA applications prior to cytologic evaluations in different geographic regions worldwide: 25–27 G in most West and 21–22 G in the Middle East^ 7-10 ^. We mentioned Category III, TBSRTC, 3rd edition, from another perspective in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 67th volume, second issue^ 11 ^. Furthermore, we reported whether it is essential to maintain Category III, anticipated TBSRTC, inevitable 3rd edition, as an indivisible category within indeterminate cytology or not, which was published in Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira, 67th volume, tenth issue^ 12 ^ prior to the current edition of this lexicon, the 2023 TBSRTC by Ali et al.^ 13 ^ published in Thyroid, which has been announced after two former successful editions by Cibas et al.^ 14,15 ^ Finally, we have recommended working with subsets to resolve the ongoing debate on "indeterminate cytology," similar to "intermediate suspicion" in radiology^ 16 ^. As such, would the utilization of thicker or finer needles alter^ 3-5 ^ the outcome(s) of this study? Furthermore, would putting topical and/or local anesthetic agents alongside this interventional procedure move on^ 1,3,7,9,10 ^ the denouement(s) of this work? Moreover, would an implementable germaneness of both novel subgroups of Category III, TBSRTC, 3rd edition, convert or modify^ 4,11,12,16 ^ the corollary of this study? This issue merits further investigation. We thank Al-Yousofy et al.^ 6 ^ for their valuable study in thyroidology.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Sengul I Sengul D Proposal of a novel terminology: minimally invasive FNA and thyroid minimally invasive FNA; MIFNA and thyroid MIFNA Ann Ital Chir 20219233033134312332 · pubmed ↗
- 2Sengul D Sengul I Soares JM Junior Repercussion of thyroid dysfunctions in thyroidology on the reproductive system: Conditio sine qua non?Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)202268672172210.1590/1806-9282.2022025535766679 PMC 9575889 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Sengul I Sengul D Apropos of quality for fine-needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules with 22-, 23-, 25-, even 27-gauge needles and indeterminate cytology in thyroidology: an aide memory Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)202268898798810.1590/1806-9282.2022049836134824 PMC 9574989 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Sengul I Sengul D May 25-31, international thyroid awareness week & May 25, world thyroid day, 2022: indetermination of indeterminate cytology, AUS/FLUS, FN, SUSP, in thyroidology?Sanamed 202217210911010.5937/sanamed.17-38153 · doi ↗
- 5Sengul D Sengul I World thyroid day 2023 in thyroidology: no overlook thyroid dis-eases to opt for "thyroid health" purposes Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)20236910 e 2023086410.1590/1806-9282.2023086437792872 PMC 10547488 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Al-Yousofy F Hamood M Almatary AM Mothanna A Al-Wageeh S Nasher ST Accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in evaluation of thyroid nodules using different ultrasonographic and cytological features Cytopathology 202435673874810.1111/cyt.1342039001663 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Sengul D Sengul I Reinterpretation on a comparison of cytological adequacy between 23- and 25-gauge in thyroidology: smaller needle gauges "ratio"nale or (over)use it?Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)20247011 e 2024087410.1590/1806-9282.2024087439630764 PMC 11639524 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Maeda H Kutomi G Satomi F Shima H Mori M Hirata K Clinicopathological characteristics of thyroid cancer misdiagnosed by fine needle aspiration Exp Ther Med 20161242766277210.3892/etm.2016.365127698782 PMC 5038463 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
