The development and evaluation of a microbiota education programme intended for women
Havva Reyhan Simsek Sira, Ozgenur Hacioglu

TL;DR
A microbiota education program for women significantly improved their knowledge about microbiota and its health implications.
Contribution
The study developed and evaluated an educational program to enhance women's understanding of microbiota and its role in reproductive health.
Findings
Participants showed significantly higher knowledge scores after the training compared to before.
The program effectively reached all female participants regardless of age, education, or reproductive history.
Abstract
Findings in the literature indicate that women often have incorrect or incomplete knowledge about the concepts of microbiota, microbiome, probiotics, prebiotics, and their relationship with women's health, pregnancy, childbirth methods, and breast milk. In this regard, designing educational programs that contribute to preventing reproductive system infections, achieving positive fertility outcomes, and supporting the health processes of women and newborns through the microbiota of the female body can contribute to the current situation. In line with this aim, in this study, the development and evaluation of a microbiota education program for women were conducted. The research was conducted with 151 female participants in a pre-test and post-test, single-group, quasi-experimental design. The trainings were conducted for 2 days, with a total of 4 h for each group, 2 h each day. The…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
| Variables | n | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age ( | Under 27 years | 71 | 47 |
| 27 years and older | 80 | 53 | |
| Education level | Primary School | 1 | 0.7 |
| High school | 12 | 7.9 | |
| University | 130 | 86.1 | |
| Graduate (master's/PhD) | 8 | 5.3 | |
| Occupation | Midwife | 22 | 14.6 |
| Housewife | 28 | 18.5 | |
| Nurse | 41 | 27.5 | |
| Teacher | 14 | 9.3 | |
| Other | 46 | 30.5 | |
| Income status | Income less than expenses | 33 | 21.9 |
| Income equal to expenses | 103 | 68.2 | |
| Income greater than expenses | 15 | 9.9 | |
| Number of births | None | 112 | 74.2 |
| One | 25 | 16.6 | |
| Two or more | 14 | 9.3 | |
| Mode of birth | None | 112 | 74.2 |
| Normal | 13 | 8.6 | |
| Cesarean | 23 | 15.2 | |
| Normal and cesarean | 3 | 2.0 | |
| Presence of diagnosed illness | Yes (anemia, asthma, thyroid, etc.) | 32 | 21.2 |
| No | 119 | 78.8 | |
| Presence of medication | Yes (euthyrox, thyroid medication, etc.) | 23 | 15.2 |
| No | 128 | 84.8 | |
| Total | 151 | 100 | |
| Questions | Pre-training incorrect | Pre-training correct | Post-training incorrect | Post-training correct | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| 1 | 40 | 26.7 | 110 | 73.3 | 5 | 3.3 | 145 | 96.7 |
| 2 | 29 | 19.3 | 121 | 80.7 | 1 | 0.7 | 149 | 99.3 |
| 3 | 46 | 30.7 | 104 | 69.3 | 3 | 2 | 147 | 98 |
| 4 | 21 | 14 | 129 | 86 | 19 | 12.7 | 131 | 87.3 |
| 5 | 10 | 6.7 | 140 | 93.3 | 3 | 2 | 147 | 98 |
| 6 | 20 | 13.3 | 130 | 86.7 | 10 | 6.7 | 140 | 93.3 |
| 7 | 112 | 74.7 | 38 | 25.3 | 69 | 46 | 81 | 54 |
| 8 | 40 | 26.7 | 110 | 73.3 | 3 | 2 | 147 | 98 |
| 9 | 19 | 12.7 | 131 | 87.3 | 15 | 10 | 135 | 90 |
| 10 | 19 | 12.7 | 131 | 87.3 | 0 | 0 | 150 | 100 |
| 11 | 15 | 10 | 135 | 90 | 7 | 4.7 | 143 | 95.3 |
| 12 | 62 | 41.3 | 88 | 58.7 | 13 | 8.7 | 137 | 91.3 |
| 13 | 59 | 39.3 | 91 | 60.7 | 31 | 20.7 | 119 | 79.3 |
| 14 | 58 | 38.7 | 92 | 61,3 | 14 | 9.3 | 136 | 90.7 |
| 15 | 44 | 29.3 | 106 | 70.7 | 4 | 2.7 | 146 | 97.3 |
| 16 | 65 | 43.3 | 85 | 56.7 | 23 | 15.3 | 127 | 84.7 |
| 17 | 33 | 22 | 117 | 78 | 21 | 14 | 129 | 86 |
| 18 | 73 | 48,7 | 77 | 51.3 | 15 | 10 | 135 | 90 |
| 19 | 64 | 42,7 | 86 | 57.3 | 8 | 5.3 | 142 | 94.7 |
| 20 | 36 | 24 | 114 | 76 | 31 | 20.7 | 119 | 79.3 |
| Variables | Pre-training | Post-training | Z (test value) | P | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | x | SD | Median | x | SD | ||||
| Age | Under 27 years | 75.00 | 72.11 | 13.14 | 95.00 | 90.63 | 8.82 | -7.190 | 0.000 |
| 27 years and older | 70.00 | 67.88 | 13.21 | 90.00 | 88.56 | 9.97 | -7.564 | 0.000 | |
| Education level | Primary school | 60.00 | 60.00 | – | 80.00 | 80.00 | – | – | – |
| High school | 65.00 | 63.33 | 13.03 | 85.00 | 81.67 | 17.62 | -2.856 | 0.004 | |
| University | 70.00 | 70.04 | 13.24 | 90.00 | 90.15 | 8.33 | -9.723 | 0.000 | |
| Graduate (master's/PhD) | 77.50 | 78.13 | 11.32 | 92.50 | 92.50 | 4.63 | -2.375 | 0.018 | |
|
| Midwife | 75.00 | 71.59 | 13.75 | 95.00 | 92.05 | 7.97 | -4.117 | 0.000 |
| Housewife | 60.00 | 63.04 | 13.08 | 90.00 | 84.82 | 14.30 | -4.502 | 0.000 | |
| Nurse | 75.00 | 73.05 | 11.77 | 90.00 | 90.37 | 7.53 | -5.398 | 0.000 | |
| Teacher | 67.50 | 65.71 | 13.13 | 92.50 | 88.93 | 8.81 | -3.302 | 0.001 | |
| Other | 70.00 | 71.63 | 13.34 | 90.00 | 90.65 | 7.42 | -5.727 | 0.000 | |
| Mode of birth | None | 75.00 | 70.85 | 13.03 | 90.00 | 90.45 | 8.37 | -9.001 | 0.000 |
| Normal | 60.00 | 60.00 | 10.80 | 90.00 | 86.92 | 17.14 | -3.117 | 0.002 | |
| Cesarean | 75.00 | 71.96 | 14.36 | 90.00 | 88.26 | 7.92 | -4.033 | 0.000 | |
| Normal and Cesarean | 60.00 | 60.00 | 0.00 | 80.00 | 76.67 | 5.77 | -1.633 | 0.102 | |
| Comparison of total knowledge scores before and after training | 70.00 | 69.87 | 13.30 | 90.00 | 89.54 | 9.48 | -10.412 | 0.000 | |
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGut microbiota and health · Pediatric health and respiratory diseases · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
INTRODUCTION
Microbiota refers to the microorganisms present in humans. The genome of these microorganisms is called the microbiome. Microbiota is a community of living organisms consisting of bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and other microorganisms that inhabit various areas of the human body, such as the oral cavity, skin, respiratory tract, intestines, and vagina^ 1,2 ^.
The human microbiota begins to develop in the womb. The microbiota that starts to form during the intrauterine period grows and changes in relation to human health as the individual ages. Previously, it was believed that the womb was sterile; however, this notion has changed with the detection of various microorganisms in the placenta, umbilical cord, amniotic fluid, and meconium^ 2 ^. It is known that the placenta, which facilitates blood flow to the baby, contains a small amount of a rich microbiota gene. Factors affecting the development of the microbiota include genetic factors, age, mode of birth, nutrition, antibiotic use, lifestyle, and environmental factors^ 1 ^.
Recent studies have emphasized the importance of the microbiota in preventing reproductive system infections and achieving positive fertilization outcomes, highlighting its significance for women's health. Concurrently, the effects of microbiota on mode of birth and neonatal health are among the most reported topics^ 2–4 ^. In this regard, recognizing the microbiota and understanding the factors that influence it is seen as a practice that can contribute to supporting women's and neonatal health^ 5–7 ^. The aim of this study was to implement an educational program on microbiota and women's health, which could be suitable for different education levels, and to assess the knowledge levels of participating women before and after the training.
METHODS
Study design and participant recruitment
The study was designed as a single-group quasi-experimental study with pre-tests and post-tests. A total of 151 people who agreed to attend the training regularly participated in the training program. Participants received training for a total of 4 h over 2 weeks, with 2 h of instruction each week.
Instrument
Participant introductory characteristics questionnaire and microbiota knowledge form (the test form used in pre-tests and post-tests) were used as data collection tools. The microbiota knowledge form was administered to participants again as a post-test 4 weeks after the training.
Microbiota Knowledge Form: This form contains 20 questions related to the topics covered in the training, and participants were asked to respond with "True" or "False." Each correct answer earned the participant 5 points, while no points were awarded for incorrect answers. Participants who answered all questions correctly received a total score of 100 points. Participants answered the microbiota knowledge form as both a pre-test and a post-test, after which the pre-test and post-test scores were compared.
The training program includes seven topic areas: introduction to microbiota, human microbiota (women's health, vaginal microbiota), fertilization, mode of birth, pregnancy, breastfeeding, and probiotics.
Ethical aspect
Before starting the research, necessary permissions were obtained from the Ethics Committee of Kirklareli University Institute of Health Sciences (Protocol No: PR0418R0, Decision No: 7, Decision Date: 17.10.2022) and from the Kirklareli Provincial Health Directorate (Decision No: 33, Decision Date: 26.12.2022). All stages of the study were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Statistical analysis
The data obtained from the research were analyzed using the free trial version of SPSS Statistics (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) for Windows 25.0. Descriptive statistical methods were used to evaluate the data. Non-parametric tests were used for the evaluation of the variables. The analysis results were evaluated at a significance level of p<0.05.
RESULTS
A total of 151 women participated in the research, and their distribution according to demographic characteristics is shown in Table 1.
The distribution of correct and incorrect answers given by participants to the questions in the knowledge test is presented in Table 2.
It was determined that there is a statistically significant difference between participants’ knowledge scores before and after the training, with post-training knowledge scores increasing (p<0.05) (Table 3).
DISCUSSION
Recent studies have largely revealed the significant effects of the microbiota on women's health^ 2,4,8 ^. The common feature of studies in the literature that aim to measure individuals’ awareness of microbiota, probiotics, and prebiotics is their goal of recognizing the factors affecting the microbiota in health maintenance^ 6,7,9,10 ^. In this context, the scarcity of educational studies in the literature is noteworthy, and increasing research that enables individuals to establish the relationship between microbiota and health could address this existing limitation. This study, conducted with parallel aims, seeks to educate 151 female participants on the importance of microbiota in women's health through various topics (reproductive system infections, fertilization, infertility, pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum period, and newborn health) with diverse variables (age, occupation, etc.). The microbiota knowledge test, consisting of questions related to the topics covered in the training, was administered before and after the education to evaluate the participants’ knowledge levels.
The research design was prepared using examples of planned educational programs related to women's health. In this context, literature on planned reproductive health education given to women that may be relevant to the topic of "microbiota—protection of vaginal health" included in our training program can be provided as case studies ^ 5,11–13 ^.
In a study investigating individuals’ microbiota awareness levels, statistical significance was found for educational level and occupational group concerning microbiota awareness scale scores^ 14 ^. In parallel with this research, the current study included 151 female participants, and it was determined that the post-education knowledge scores of participants from all occupational groups were higher than their pre-education scores. When examining the pre-education knowledge scores according to participants’ professions, it was found that those in health-related occupations had higher microbiota awareness compared to other groups.
Looking at other studies, there are evaluations of individuals’ knowledge levels regarding microbiota in relation to prebiotics and probiotics. In some studies, variables such as gender, occupation, and education have been used to investigate individuals’ awareness of probiotics, prebiotics, and microbiota concepts, as well as their consumption of probiotic products^ 2,4,8 ^. In a study by Khalesi et al, it was determined that among female participants, those with higher education levels used probiotics more^ 9 ^. In this research, when examining the education status of the participants, the proportion of women with master's or doctoral degrees was found to be 5.3%. It was determined that women with undergraduate and graduate degrees had higher awareness. The study revealed a proportional relationship between education level and the awareness of the importance of the relationship between microbiota and health. Therefore, it can be recommended to provide necessary education and supportive care regarding microbiota and health for women who are planning pregnancy but do not have a high level of education.
A study assessing the health literacy related to gut microbiota among Italian women included a total of 1,076 women, comprising pregnant women and women with children under the age of two. Researchers found that pregnant women were less likely to recognize the role of breastfeeding in the development of infant gut microbiota compared to non-pregnant women. Additionally, it was reported that participants had a moderate level of knowledge about infant gut microbiota. Among the participants, 97.5% reported an increased interest in gut microbiota^ 7 ^. In this study, it was observed that before education, 69.3% of participants correctly answered the question, "the foundation of human microbiota is determined by the mother's gut system and the method of delivery," while after education, this increased to 98%. The findings of this research indicated that the increase in knowledge scores post-education contributed to women's understanding of how the foods consumed during pregnancy influence their infants’ gut microbiota and the preservation of obstetric health.
During the training, the importance of the connection between vaginal health, normal delivery, newborn microbiota health, and maternal milk was explained in detail to the participants. The increase in knowledge levels identified after the training indicates that the participants understood the relationship between microbiota and health. It was determined that the participants learned about the concept of probiotics and grasped their importance after the training.
CONCLUSION
As a result of the evaluations conducted, it was concluded that this microbiota education program developed and implemented for women addresses all groups. It was determined that the number of correct answers given by participants in the microbiota knowledge test increased after the training. In this context, it is recommended to include microbiota health education in schools, preconception education, childbirth preparation courses, and general health education to raise societal awareness of microbiota.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Aagaard K Ma J Antony KM Ganu R Petrosino J Versalovic J The placenta harbors a unique microbiome Sci Transl Med 20146237237 ra 65237 ra 6510.1126/scitranslmed.3008599 PMC 492921724848255 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Nannini G Amedei A Women health and microbiota: different aspects of well-being World J Gastroenterol 202430101287129010.3748/wjg.v 30.i 10.128738596491 PMC 11000092 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Blaser MJ Devkota S Mc Coy KD Relman DA Yassour M Young VB Lessons learned from the prenatal microbiome controversy Microbiome 2021918810.1186/s 40168-020-00946-233436098 PMC 7805060 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Huang JL Wang X Yu F Li MY Tang YT Vaginal microbiota abnormalities in women with unexplained infertility and its treatment Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 202357111813181910.3760/cma.j.cn 112150-20230322-0021738008571 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Dulger D Raising awareness to add microbiotas to pregnancy nutrition education J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal 202118399499610.38136/jgon.990808 · doi ↗
- 6Atay R Hacioglu O Determination of microbiota awareness levels in women planning pregnancy Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)2024705 e 2023140110.1590/1806-9282.2023140138775507 PMC 11111118 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Consales A Toscano L Ceriotti C Tiraferri V Castaldi S GiannìML From womb to world: mapping gut microbiota-related health literacy among Italian mothers, a cross-sectional study BMC Public Health 20242411012101210.1186/s 12889-024-18497-838605379 PMC 11010343 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Silva VF Refinetti P Junior JM Baracat EC Pacchetti B Vaginal microbiome and a prospective analysis of vaginal microbiome testing and personalized probiotics supplementation as a beneficial approach to unlock optimal health for women: a narrative review Eur Gynecol Obstetr 202352495410.53260/EGO.235022 · doi ↗
