Correction: Buyers, maybe moving second is not that bad after all: low-power, anxiety, and making inferior first offers
Yossi Maaravi, Ben Heller
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsConferences and Exhibitions Management · Sharing Economy and Platforms · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
In the published article, there was an error in the text. Two p-values were rounded to two decimal places (instead of three) and consequently reported as statistically significant.
A correction has been made to Study 1, Results, Paragraph 2.
This sentence previously stated:
“In the second step of the analysis, the interaction between anxiety and power was entered revealing a significant effect (β = −0.16, B = −129.4, t = −1.94, p = 0.05) which explained a significant increase in variance in first offer, ΔR^2^ = 0.026, F(1, 107) = 3.77, p = 0.05.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“In the second step of the analysis, the interaction between anxiety and power was entered, revealing a trend in the expected direction that fell short of statistical significance (β = −0.16, B = −129.4, t = −1.94, p = 0.055). The increase in variance in first offer [ΔR^2^ = 0.026, F(1,107) = 3.77, p = 0.055] shows a similar trend that did not reach statistical significance.”
Additionally, the correspondence email address as published has been amended. Instead of “[email protected]” it should be “[email protected]”.
The original article has been updated.