# Establishing a Public Involvement Network for Chronic Pain Research in the United Kingdom: Lessons Learned

**Authors:** Sharon Grieve, Rosie Harrison, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, Ian Taverner, Joanne Lloyd, Noureen Shivji, Ellen Readman, Adele Higginbottom, Colin Wilkinson, Lisa Austin, Edmund Keogh, Candida McCabe

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/hex.70373 · Health Expectations : An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy · 2025-08-10

## TL;DR

This paper describes how a public involvement network was created to support chronic pain research in the UK, ensuring a patient-centered approach.

## Contribution

The paper introduces an innovative model for embedding public involvement in chronic pain research through a large collaborative network.

## Key findings

- A diverse public involvement network was established with 36 adult contributors.
- Key lessons were identified in recruitment, collaboration, and retention of public contributors.
- The model can guide others in maximizing public involvement in research.

## Abstract

The Consortium to Research Individual, Interpersonal and Social Influences in Pain (CRIISP) is a 4‐year UK university collaboration investigating how thoughts and feelings, personal relationships and lifestyle can affect chronic pain. Patient and public involvement in research recognises that researchers' conceptions of health and illness can be enriched and sense‐checked by those of people experiencing a health condition. Published literature reports a gap in meaningful patient and public involvement in research into chronic pain, for example, during early study design. Input in this formative stage aimed to ensure the research proposed had a patient‐centred focus which may benefit study implementation.

We describe how the authors sought to address this gap and established a diverse public involvement (PI) network to support the CRIISP research.

Thirty‐six adult public contributors were appointed to work alongside the research teams. Lessons learned are presented under the themes: optimising collaborative working, recruitment of public contributors, supporting public involvement throughout CRIISP and the retention of public contributors. Throughout this paper, we refer to the term ‘public involvement’ rather than ‘patient and public involvement’ in accordance with the NIHR definition which incorporates people with a range of experiences.

Working in partnership with our public contributors, we have embedded PI throughout a chronic pain research programme using an innovative and collaborative process.

This model may inform others to maximise the potential of PI within their research.

The paper reports the collaboration between public contributors with a lived experience of chronic pain and the Consortium to Research Individual, Interpersonal and Social influences in Pain (CRIISP) researchers, by means of a large public involvement network.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Pain (MESH:D010146), Chronic Pain (MESH:D059350)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12336369/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12336369/full.md

## References

42 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12336369/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12336369